Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove loading state from modal if the payment preview fails #9735

Merged

Conversation

ClementChaumel
Copy link
Contributor

Done

  • Correctly catch errors for the payment modal call and remove loading state even if it fails.

QA

This is a bit tricky to QA

Here is one way: https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/web--ubuntu-clan-5931746dba512f05402b61f6/issues/canonical-web-and-design/ubuntu.com/9724

Another way would be to fetch this branch and modify the call to purchase preview so it always returns an error and see that the modal still loads.

Important

This addresses https://github.com/canonical-web-and-design/web-squad/issues/4087 and should remove the bug for users but I don't believe this fixes the root cause of the payment preview failing.

@webteam-app
Copy link

Demo starting at https://ubuntu-com-9735.demos.haus

})
.catch((error) => {
modal.classList.remove("is-processing");
setOrderTotals(null, false, currentTransaction, modal);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we display an error to the user when this happens?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure. my understanding of the situation is correct, it fails when a payment method is missing from their account. But going through the modal will create a new payment method and attach it to the account.
I'm not sure what the error message could be for it to make sense to the user and if going through the flow normally fixes it then I find it reasonable to let it fail silently?

@alnvdl Do you think it makes sense?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this seamlessly gets the user back on track then that is fine.

.catch((error) => {
modal.classList.remove("is-processing");
setOrderTotals(null, false, currentTransaction, modal);
console.error(error);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you report this issue to sentry?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I'm not mistaken we don't have a sentry client for the frontend. And I believe we log any failed backend (flask) call. So this would be reported to sentry as a failed /advantage/subscribe/preview call.
Do you think it would be worth adding Sentry to the front end as well? I think it could be useful. It was first mentioned here canonical/jp.ubuntu.com#131 and then later on here to help us debug unknown errors in the shop https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/web--ubuntu-clan-5931746dba512f05402b61f6/issues/canonical-web-and-design/ubuntu.com/9543

I'm willing to do it but I think it would be a different ticket

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do catch those in the back-end already. It might be redundant to add them in the front-end too.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We will have a huge set of front-end only failures that do not result in errors in the backend. So I think it's worth it but agree is a separate issue.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Related to this: #9543

Copy link
Contributor

@albertkol albertkol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@albertkol albertkol merged commit eb96f2e into canonical:master May 11, 2021
@ClementChaumel ClementChaumel deleted the fix-modal-crashing-on-failed-preview branch May 12, 2021 06:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants