Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove loading state from modal if the payment preview fails #9735

Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
37 changes: 31 additions & 6 deletions static/js/src/ua-payment-modal.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -401,14 +401,39 @@ function applyLoggedInPurchaseTotals() {
currentTransaction.accountId,
currentTransaction.products,
currentTransaction.previousPurchaseId
).then((purchasePreview) => {
currentTransaction.total = purchasePreview.total;
currentTransaction.tax = purchasePreview.taxAmount;
modal.classList.remove("is-processing");
setOrderTotals(country, vatApplicable, purchasePreview, modal);
});
)
.then((purchasePreview) => {
currentTransaction.total = purchasePreview.total;
currentTransaction.tax = purchasePreview.taxAmount;
modal.classList.remove("is-processing");
if (purchasePreview.errors) {
setOrderTotals(
null,
false,
{
total: currentTransaction.subtotal,
},
modal
);
} else {
setOrderTotals(country, vatApplicable, purchasePreview, modal);
}
})
.catch((error) => {
modal.classList.remove("is-processing");
setOrderTotals(
null,
false,
{
total: currentTransaction.subtotal,
},
modal
);
console.error(error);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you report this issue to sentry?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I'm not mistaken we don't have a sentry client for the frontend. And I believe we log any failed backend (flask) call. So this would be reported to sentry as a failed /advantage/subscribe/preview call.
Do you think it would be worth adding Sentry to the front end as well? I think it could be useful. It was first mentioned here canonical/jp.ubuntu.com#131 and then later on here to help us debug unknown errors in the shop https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/web--ubuntu-clan-5931746dba512f05402b61f6/issues/canonical-web-and-design/ubuntu.com/9543

I'm willing to do it but I think it would be a different ticket

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do catch those in the back-end already. It might be redundant to add them in the front-end too.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We will have a huge set of front-end only failures that do not result in errors in the backend. So I think it's worth it but agree is a separate issue.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Related to this: #9543

});
})
.catch((error) => {
modal.classList.remove("is-processing");
console.error(error);
});
}
Expand Down