-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 269
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove wildcard re-exports #682
Conversation
ACK modulo CI |
Looks like CI is red because of formatting. |
8384783
to
863fd96
Compare
Ran the formatter, no other changes. |
Ah, sanitizers again :) |
EDIT: I just did #687 |
863fd96
to
9e1ec1a
Compare
No acks so rebasing to get up to date with master branch. |
So, in #656 we added a "check for changes to the public API" script but it looks like we have failed to CI-enforce this. Therefore this PR is unnecessarily hard to check. I think, for one, that you are losing a reexport of Can you open a PR to run the API script (there are a bunch of changes even on master) and to CI-check this, then rebase this PR on that? |
Yep sure thing. |
The `just` command makes scripts and commands discoverable for new devs and old devs alike when switching between repos. Add a justfile copied from bitcoin with changes as required.
Add a command to run the `contrib/check-for-api-changes.sh` script.
Run `just check-api` and commit the changes. We should have never gotten to this state, upcoming patch will check for changes in CI.
Add a job to run the `contrib/check-for-api-changes.sh` script in CI.
Copy the script from `rust-bitcoin`, also add a `just` command to call it.
9e1ec1a
to
1dc5bd2
Compare
Now on top of #691 |
Wildcards make it hard to grep for where stuff comes from, explicit imports and re-exports are ... more explicit. Import and re-export explicitly instead of by using wildcards.
Wildcards make it hard to grep for where stuff comes from, explicit imports and re-exports are ... more explicit. Re-export the `key` types explicitly.
1dc5bd2
to
0da394e
Compare
Awesome :). So much easier to review. I'm gonna try to ACK/merge this even though both Github and my local tools see it as 7 independent commits (even though 5 are already in master). I verified that the first 5 are exactly the same commits in #691. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 0da394e
The merge-base changed after approval.
Wildcards make it hard to grep for where stuff comes from, explicit imports and re-exports are ... more explicit.
context
types explicitly.key
types explicitly.Fix: #681