Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove nx-cugraph build/test/publish from cugraph #4748

Merged

Conversation

nv-rliu
Copy link
Contributor

@nv-rliu nv-rliu commented Nov 7, 2024

Closes https://github.com/rapidsai/graph_dl/issues/646

As part of the repo migration effort, this PR removes steps relevant to build/test/publish of nx-cugraph from this repo.

Changes are ready but just to be safe DO NOT MERGE until we begin publishing packages from the new repo.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci label Nov 7, 2024
@nv-rliu nv-rliu added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function breaking Breaking change graph-devops Issues for the graph-devops team labels Nov 7, 2024
@nv-rliu nv-rliu marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2024 21:10
@nv-rliu nv-rliu requested a review from a team as a code owner November 7, 2024 21:10
ci/test_wheel.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nv-rliu nv-rliu added this to the 24.12 milestone Nov 7, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jameslamb jameslamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! This looks perfect, this should be enough to ensure we don't publish any more nx-cugraph 24.12 nightlies to the nightly PyPI index / rapidsai-nightly conda channel.

Up to you two, but I'd wait to merge this until we're ready to publish from the nx-cugraph repo.

@nv-rliu nv-rliu added the DO NOT MERGE Hold off on merging; see PR for details label Nov 8, 2024
@nv-rliu nv-rliu removed the DO NOT MERGE Hold off on merging; see PR for details label Nov 12, 2024
@nv-rliu nv-rliu requested a review from a team November 12, 2024 15:47
Copy link
Contributor

@eriknw eriknw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we delete this FIXME now and PY_IGNORE_IMPORTMISMATCH=1? Or is this needed for other libraries?

cugraph/ci/test_wheel.sh

Lines 30 to 34 in 2d1189b

# FIXME: Adding PY_IGNORE_IMPORTMISMATCH=1 to workaround conftest.py import
# mismatch error seen by nx-cugraph after using pytest 8 and
# --import-mode=append.
RAPIDS_DATASET_ROOT_DIR=`pwd`/datasets \
PY_IGNORE_IMPORTMISMATCH=1 \

Also, for posterity / reminder-to-self, docs are still in the cugraph repo:

sed_runner "s/branch-[0-9][0-9].[0-9][0-9]/branch-${NEXT_SHORT_TAG}/" ./docs/cugraph/source/nx_cugraph/nx_cugraph.md

I don't consider these blockers, so I'm going ahead and approving 🚀

@nv-rliu
Copy link
Contributor Author

nv-rliu commented Nov 12, 2024

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit a5fdc8b into rapidsai:branch-24.12 Nov 12, 2024
116 checks passed
@nv-rliu nv-rliu deleted the branch-24.12-remove-nx-publish branch November 12, 2024 19:28
jameslamb added a commit to rapidsai/rapids-metadata that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
In the 24.12 release, `nx-cugraph` is moving to its own repo:

* https://github.com/rapidsai/nx-cugraph
* rapidsai/cugraph#4748

This updates the 24.12 metadata to reflect that.
rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
Similar to #4748, but for `cugraph-dgl` and `cugraph-pyg`.

This PR removes all building, publishing, and testing code related to `cugraph-dgl` and `cugraph-pyg`. Those projects will very soon start publishing packages from https://github.com/rapidsai/cugraph-gnn instead.

Authors:
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)

Approvers:
  - Ralph Liu (https://github.com/nv-rliu)
  - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice)

URL: #4752
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking Breaking change ci graph-devops Issues for the graph-devops team improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants