-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable datadog integration in sandbox configuration #285
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to various Terraform configuration files, primarily focusing on version increments and hash replacements for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
💰 Infracost reportMonthly estimate decreased by $25 📉
*Usage costs were estimated using Infracost Cloud settings, see docs for other options. Estimate details (includes details of unsupported resources)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
regional/README.md (1)
⚠️ PR changes incomplete for disabling Datadog integrationThe codebase contains several Datadog-related configurations that need attention to properly disable the integration:
tfvars/sandbox.tfvars
has a commenteddatadog_enable
variable that needs to be explicitly set tofalse
main.tf
contains a Datadog module that's conditionally created based onvar.datadog_enable
regional/datadog/
directory contains Datadog operator configurations that may need to be removed or disabledThe PR currently only updates provider versions but doesn't address these Datadog-related configurations. Please either:
- Set
datadog_enable = false
intfvars/sandbox.tfvars
- Consider removing the Datadog-related configurations if they're no longer needed
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-24
:⚠️ PR changes don't align with its objectiveThe PR's objective is to disable datadog integration in sandbox configuration, but the changes only include:
- Provider version updates in .terraform.lock.hcl files
- Module source and version updates in README.md
Please verify if:
- Additional changes are needed to disable the datadog integration
- The PR title needs to be updated to reflect these maintenance changes
Let's verify if there are any datadog-related files that should be modified:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for datadog-related configuration files echo "Searching for datadog-related files..." fd -t f -e tf -e yaml -e yml datadog # Search for datadog-related code echo "Searching for datadog-related code..." rg -i "datadog" -g '!{*.lock.hcl,*.md}'Length of output: 3100
regional/istio/README.md (2)
Line range hint
1-67
: Document Datadog integration changesThe README updates reflect provider version changes but don't include any documentation about the disabled Datadog integration. Consider adding a note about this architectural change if it affects this module.
Line range hint
1-67
: Verify PR scope and implementationThe current changes appear to focus on provider version updates rather than disabling the Datadog integration. Please clarify:
- Where and how is the Datadog integration being disabled?
- Are the provider version updates related to this change?
- Should there be additional changes to remove Datadog-related configurations?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (23)
.terraform.lock.hcl
(1 hunks)README.md
(1 hunks)regional/README.md
(1 hunks)regional/cert-manager/.terraform.lock.hcl
(2 hunks)regional/cert-manager/README.md
(1 hunks)regional/cert-manager/istio-csr/.terraform.lock.hcl
(2 hunks)regional/cert-manager/istio-csr/README.md
(1 hunks)regional/datadog/.terraform.lock.hcl
(2 hunks)regional/datadog/README.md
(1 hunks)regional/datadog/manifests/.terraform.lock.hcl
(2 hunks)regional/datadog/manifests/README.md
(1 hunks)regional/istio/.terraform.lock.hcl
(2 hunks)regional/istio/README.md
(1 hunks)regional/istio/manifests/.terraform.lock.hcl
(2 hunks)regional/istio/manifests/README.md
(1 hunks)regional/onboarding/.terraform.lock.hcl
(2 hunks)regional/onboarding/README.md
(1 hunks)regional/opa-gatekeeper/.terraform.lock.hcl
(2 hunks)regional/opa-gatekeeper/README.md
(1 hunks)regional/opa-gatekeeper/manifests/.terraform.lock.hcl
(2 hunks)regional/opa-gatekeeper/manifests/README.md
(1 hunks)shared/helpers.tf
(1 hunks)tfvars/sandbox.tfvars
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (12)
- shared/helpers.tf
- tfvars/sandbox.tfvars
- regional/onboarding/README.md
- regional/datadog/.terraform.lock.hcl
- README.md
- regional/opa-gatekeeper/.terraform.lock.hcl
- regional/datadog/manifests/.terraform.lock.hcl
- regional/cert-manager/README.md
- regional/cert-manager/istio-csr/.terraform.lock.hcl
- regional/onboarding/.terraform.lock.hcl
- regional/cert-manager/.terraform.lock.hcl
- regional/opa-gatekeeper/manifests/.terraform.lock.hcl
🔇 Additional comments (9)
regional/opa-gatekeeper/manifests/README.md (1)
16-16
: Verify the helpers module path change impact
The helpers module source path now includes //root
and version is bumped to v0.1.2
. Please ensure this change is compatible with existing module usage.
✅ Verification successful
The helpers module path and version are consistently used across the codebase
The search results show that all references to the terraform-core-helpers
module consistently use the //root
path and version v0.1.2
across the entire codebase, including in the actual module source reference in shared/helpers.tf
. This confirms that the change in the reviewed file is aligned with the rest of the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the new module version and path are consistently used across the codebase
rg -l "terraform-core-helpers" | xargs rg "v0.1.[12]"
Length of output: 2578
regional/opa-gatekeeper/README.md (1)
12-12
: Verify provider and module version compatibility
The changes include:
- Google provider version bump to 6.12.0
- Helpers module update to v0.1.2 with //root path
Please ensure these version updates have been tested in a non-production environment.
Also applies to: 18-18
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the provider versions and constraints.
Let me check the actual Terraform configuration files in the opa-gatekeeper directory to see the provider configurations.
Provider version update appears safe to proceed
The Google provider version update to 6.12.0 appears safe as:
- The provider configuration in the opa-gatekeeper module only specifies the source without pinning a specific version
- The version constraint is managed at the root level providers configuration
- The module only uses basic Google provider features (data sources for project and GKE cluster information)
The helpers module update to v0.1.2 is also consistent with the implementation in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any provider version constraints in the codebase
rg "required_providers" -A 5
Length of output: 820
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for provider version constraints and configurations
rg "google\s*=\s*\{" -A 3 regional/providers.tf regional/shared/providers.tf
rg "version\s*=\s*" regional/opa-gatekeeper/
Length of output: 447
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check terraform configuration files in opa-gatekeeper
fd -e tf . regional/opa-gatekeeper/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 4575
regional/datadog/README.md (1)
12-12
: Verify version updates and PR objective alignment
The version updates seem unrelated to the PR objective of disabling Datadog integration in sandbox configuration.
Let's verify if there are related changes in other files:
Also applies to: 18-18
regional/datadog/manifests/README.md (1)
12-12
: Version updates appear unrelated to PR objective
Similar to the previous file, these version updates don't seem to contribute to disabling Datadog integration.
Also applies to: 18-18
regional/istio/manifests/README.md (2)
Line range hint 1-1
: Request: Clarification needed on PR objective
The PR title indicates this change is meant to disable Datadog integration in sandbox configuration, but the provided files only show version updates to the Google provider and helpers module. Could you please:
- Clarify where the actual Datadog integration changes are located
- Provide the relevant configuration files that disable Datadog in sandbox environment
- Explain if these version updates are necessary prerequisites for the Datadog changes
This will help ensure the changes align with the PR objective and maintain clear change boundaries.
12-12
: Question: Are these changes in scope?
These version updates in the Istio manifests directory appear to be:
- Unrelated to the PR objective of disabling Datadog integration
- Potentially out of scope for this PR
Consider splitting these version updates into a separate PR to maintain clear change boundaries and simplify review.
Let's check if these changes are part of a broader version update:
Also applies to: 18-18
regional/istio/manifests/.terraform.lock.hcl (1)
Line range hint 5-57
: Similar provider version updates as in parent directory.
.terraform.lock.hcl (2)
Line range hint 4-33
: Verify if Datadog provider should be removed
The PR objective is to disable Datadog integration in sandbox configuration, but the Datadog provider configuration remains unchanged. Please verify if this provider should be removed as part of disabling the integration.
✅ Verification successful
Datadog provider configuration is correctly maintained
The Datadog provider configuration in .terraform.lock.hcl
should remain as the codebase uses a conditional deployment pattern:
- The
datadog_enable
variable defaults tofalse
, effectively disabling the integration - The Datadog module is conditionally created using
count = var.datadog_enable ? 1 : 0
- The provider and its configuration are required even when disabled, as they're referenced in the module definitions
The presence of the provider in the lock file is correct and necessary for the terraform configuration to be valid, even when the integration is disabled.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Datadog provider is still being used
rg -l "provider\s+\"datadog\"" --type terraform
Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Datadog provider usage in all files
rg -l "provider\s+\"datadog\""
# Also check for any Datadog resource or data source usage
rg -l "resource\s+\"datadog_"
rg -l "data\s+\"datadog_"
Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of providers.tf to understand Datadog provider usage
cat providers.tf
# Also check for any .tf files that might contain Datadog configurations
fd '.*\.tf$' --exec grep -l "datadog"
Length of output: 793
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of main.tf and variables.tf for Datadog usage
cat main.tf
cat variables.tf
# Check the content of regional Datadog configurations
cat regional/datadog/main.tf
Length of output: 4536
45-59
: Verify the Google Beta provider version update impact
The Google Beta provider version has been updated from 6.11.1 to 6.12.0. Please ensure this update is intentional and won't affect the sandbox configuration changes.
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed because the file type wasn't recognized. Let's try searching through files with terraform-related extensions and check for provider configurations.
The previous output showed configuration files but no provider configurations. Let's check the actual terraform files to find where and how the google-beta provider is being used.
After reviewing the terraform configurations, I can see that while the Google provider is used, there's no explicit configuration of the google-beta provider in any of the files. The provider configurations are managed through the modules being used, particularly the terraform-google-kubernetes-engine module.
The Google Beta provider version update is safe to proceed
The update from 6.11.1 to 6.12.0 is a minor version bump that should be backward compatible. Since the google-beta provider is not directly configured in this repository and is managed through external modules, the version update in the lock file is safe as it's being pulled in as a transitive dependency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any breaking changes in provider usage
rg "google-beta" --type terraform -A 5
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for terraform files and provider configurations
fd -e tf | xargs rg "google-beta" -A 5
# Also check for any terraform configuration files in different extensions
fd -e tfvars -e hcl | xargs cat
Length of output: 14064
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for provider configurations in .tf files
fd -e tf | xargs cat
# Also check for any terraform version constraints
fd -g "*version*.tf" | xargs cat
Length of output: 46587
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
datadog_enable
variable in the sandbox configuration to prevent potential misconfigurations.Documentation