avoid conflicting pip package name with ruamel.yaml #68
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ruamel_yaml
andruamel.yaml
are equivalent names, according to pip package normalization.The result is that while
ruamel_yaml
is notruamel.yaml
and can coexist as conda packages,pip install ruamel.yaml
will consider the dependency already satisfied byruamel_yaml
if it is present, when it should not.The fix is to use a package name in setup.py that avoids such a collision.
Since this is a conda-only fork, I went with adding
_conda
, lacking a more obvious choice.The alternative fix is to remove any pip metadata from the package, but it wasn't obvious how to robustly avoid pip noticing that the package is present.
Related to #1 and conda-forge/ruamel.yaml-feedstock#7