-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated MessageLogger tests to remove obsolete usages #31865
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31865/19225
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31865/19226
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages: FWCore/Integration @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@Dr15Jones There are merge conflicts (caused by the merge of #31815) |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31865/19249
|
Pull request #31865 was updated. @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready The workflows 158.01 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Comparison Summary:
|
+1 The Reco differences are caused by #31470 that was included in the test on top of the IB. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
NOTE: neither were removed from the _cfi files used outside of the tests as that could break existing configurations. Such a change will be done at a later date.
PR validation:
Relevant framework unit tests pass.