-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HeavyIon Reaction Plane MiniAOD #31129
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.
|
scram build code-checks works fine for me on lxplus7 CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-12-1100. |
code-checks |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.
|
the code-checks issue looks repeatable the error comes after
did you run this test from scratch or just from your development area? |
here is a link to the console output in jenkins for the last code-checks |
I have clean working directory. [qwang@lxplus7118 src]$ scram build -k -j 16 code-checks
|
I see that the PR is made against CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-12-2300 (base 72bdd0a), it may be easier to wait until a new IB shows up. In the meantime, I suggest to cleanup the topic branch history so that (as much as possible) only the final files in this PR actually show up. |
Hi @slava77 , should we try again with code-checks, or should I start a clean branch to make another PR? |
code-checks |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
+1 |
@cms-sw/dqm-l2 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This seems to crate a problem in a HIon workflow doing
More info: Also affecting relvals 140.5611 159.0 310.0 |
@christopheralanwest Regarding the issue spotted by @Martin-Grunewald above, would you please update the GT corresponding to phase1_2021_realistic_hi in the same way as done for phase1_2018_realistic_hi? |
Should the 2021 scenario use the same tag as that used in |
Ah, @BetterWang will have to answer that. |
Hi, I believe we should use the auto tag. HeavyIonRPRcd_EvtPlane_MC_2018_v01_offline was replace because it is a multi-IOV tag. |
PR description:
EventPlane/ReactionPlane code update for the MiniAOD format. Also clean up the histograms in DQM.
PR validation:
This PR is tested with runTheMatrix workflow 140.5611 along with the new GT 110X_upgrade2018_realistic_HI_Candidate_2020_08_07_19_30_54.
@mandrenguyen @ssanders50