Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Common pp_on_AA modifier for 2018 and run 3 AA eras #31935

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 4, 2020

Conversation

mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

Use a common modifier 'pp_on_AA' for both Run2_2018_pp_on_AA and Run3_pp_on_PbPb eras.
Run3_pp_on_PbPb was initially implemented as a superset of Run2_2018_pp_on_AA, but they were factorized in #31668
This PR restores the previous behavior in a cleaner way.
Run2_2018_pp_on_AA workflows should be unaffected, while Run3_pp_on_PbPb picks up many customizations that were dropped.

The lighter systems (pPb, XeXe, pp ref and peripheral PbPb) are not included in the common modifier.
One could imagine further adding an overarching process modifier for all heavy ion eras, since they have some common features.
This is left for a possible future PR.

I tested with wfs 158 and 159.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31935/19376

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mandrenguyen (Matthew Nguyen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/CommonAlignmentProducer
CalibMuon/DTCalibration
CalibTracker/SiPixelQuality
Calibration/HcalAlCaRecoProducers
Calibration/TkAlCaRecoProducers
Configuration/Eras
Configuration/EventContent
Configuration/ProcessModifiers
Configuration/StandardSequences
DQM/Physics
DQM/SiStripMonitorClient
DQM/TrackingMonitorClient
DQM/TrackingMonitorSource
DQMOffline/Configuration
DQMOffline/EGamma
DQMOffline/JetMET
DQMOffline/RecoB
DQMOffline/Trigger
HLTriggerOffline/B2G
HLTriggerOffline/Common
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoBTag/ImpactParameter
RecoBTag/SecondaryVertex
RecoBTag/SoftLepton
RecoEcal/Configuration
RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers
RecoEgamma/Configuration
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaIsolationAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaPhotonProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaTools
RecoHI/HiCentralityAlgos
RecoJets/Configuration
RecoJets/JetAssociationProducers
RecoJets/JetProducers
RecoLocalCalo/Configuration
RecoLocalCalo/HcalRecProducers
RecoMET/Configuration
RecoMuon/MuonIdentification
RecoParticleFlow/Configuration
RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFTracking
RecoPixelVertexing/PixelTriplets
RecoTauTag/Configuration
RecoTracker/Configuration
RecoTracker/ConversionSeedGenerators
RecoTracker/IterativeTracking
RecoTracker/TkSeedGenerator
RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions
RecoVertex/AdaptiveVertexFinder
RecoVertex/PrimaryVertexProducer
RecoVertex/V0Producer
SimCalorimetry/HcalTrigPrimProducers
SimGeneral/Configuration
TrackingTools/GsfTracking
Validation/Configuration
Validation/EcalClusters

@andrius-k, @rekovic, @fioriNTU, @tlampen, @pohsun, @santocch, @perrotta, @civanch, @yuanchao, @silviodonato, @ErnestaP, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @tocheng, @jfernan2, @mdhildreth, @slava77, @jpata, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @benkrikler, @kmaeshima, @christopheralanwest, @franzoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@emilbols, @gouskos, @makortel, @yslai, @felicepantaleo, @jainshilpi, @jandrea, @rappoccio, @apsallid, @argiro, @Martin-Grunewald, @Fedespring, @thomreis, @tlampen, @lgray, @abbiendi, @ebrondol, @seemasharmafnal, @venturia, @pakhotin, @mmarionncern, @slomeo, @smoortga, @hdelanno, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @ahinzmann, @abdoulline, @JanFSchulte, @jhgoh, @dgulhan, @missirol, @yenjie, @cericeci, @ferencek, @rociovilar, @dkotlins, @trocino, @cbernet, @fioriNTU, @Sam-Harper, @HuguesBrun, @sroychow, @afiqaize, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @tocheng, @VinInn, @jdamgov, @bellan, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @rovere, @threus, @schoef, @mschrode, @idebruyn, @mmusich, @mtosi, @fabiocos, @clelange, @arossi83, @jdolen, @adewit, @rchatter, @riga, @battibass, @varuns23, @jazzitup, @calderona, @hatakeyamak, @sobhatta, @lecriste, @kurtejung, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @yetkinyilmaz, @andrzejnovak, @folguera, @tvami this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 26, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 8a02bf5
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e519da/10280/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-25-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e519da/10280/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2544110
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2544075
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

I see Static Check build errors unrelated to this PR, does anybody have any idea of their source?

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Nov 2, 2020

+reconstruction

  • adds a modifier pp_on_AA instead of pp_on_AA_2018 for HI workflows
  • standard reco is not affected
  • HI test workflows 158.0 and 159.0 run successfully
  • static analyzer failures are unrelated to the changes

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+operations

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Nov 2, 2020

+1

@christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Nov 3, 2020

+1

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Nov 3, 2020

@qliphy @silviodonato
may I suggest not to wait for analysis signature here.
Please consider.
Thank you.

@qliphy qliphy merged commit caa4836 into cms-sw:master Nov 4, 2020
@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Nov 4, 2020

+1

@santocch
Copy link

santocch commented Nov 4, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 4, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment