-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Common pp_on_AA modifier for 2018 and run 3 AA eras #31935
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31935/19376
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mandrenguyen (Matthew Nguyen) for master. It involves the following packages: Alignment/CommonAlignmentProducer @andrius-k, @rekovic, @fioriNTU, @tlampen, @pohsun, @santocch, @perrotta, @civanch, @yuanchao, @silviodonato, @ErnestaP, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @tocheng, @jfernan2, @mdhildreth, @slava77, @jpata, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @benkrikler, @kmaeshima, @christopheralanwest, @franzoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
I see Static Check build errors unrelated to this PR, does anybody have any idea of their source? |
+reconstruction
|
+operations |
+1 |
+alca |
+1 |
@qliphy @silviodonato |
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
Use a common modifier 'pp_on_AA' for both Run2_2018_pp_on_AA and Run3_pp_on_PbPb eras.
Run3_pp_on_PbPb was initially implemented as a superset of Run2_2018_pp_on_AA, but they were factorized in #31668
This PR restores the previous behavior in a cleaner way.
Run2_2018_pp_on_AA workflows should be unaffected, while Run3_pp_on_PbPb picks up many customizations that were dropped.
The lighter systems (pPb, XeXe, pp ref and peripheral PbPb) are not included in the common modifier.
One could imagine further adding an overarching process modifier for all heavy ion eras, since they have some common features.
This is left for a possible future PR.
I tested with wfs 158 and 159.