-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 821
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some small fixes to Chinese skyculture and Chinese contemporary skycu… #1721
Conversation
…lture,updated Bayer designations and Flamsteed designations of the stars,updated Chinese translation of skycultures.
Great PR! Please pay attention to the following items before merging: Files matching
This is an automatically generated QA checklist based on modified files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding your first pull request to Stellarium. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Western SC: Why many stars have asterisk in designation? Where is source for many strange designation for stars?
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ | |||
677|α_And | |||
841|22_And |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
HIP 841 = 22 And according to SIMBAD
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ | |||
10176|59_And_A | |||
10180|59_And_B | |||
10340|60_And | |||
10805|61_And* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
HIP 10805 = 61 And according to SIMBAD
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
10805|61_And* | |
10805|61_And* |
according to V520_Persei and
Table of stars with Flamsteed designations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where you see asterisk for 61 And? Just for note: asterisk and double asterisk in SIMBAD are not part of star designation, but this is part of SIMBAD designations, meaning star and double star respectively.
113136|76_Aqr | ||
113148|77_Aqr | ||
113127|78_Aqr | ||
113686|80_Aqr? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to SIMBAD this star hasn’t Flamesteed or Bayer designation. Where is source for it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
113686|80_Aqr? | |
113686|80_Aqr? |
according to Table of stars with Flamsteed designations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In Wikipedia you may see that designation 80 Aqr maybe associated to HIP 113686.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please do not draw from all possible sources without giving references. A Wikipedia list without source is not good. I see "HD217563?" which further refers to HIP113686. But it's unclear who made the identification.
@alex-w I just noted name.fab is not described in Appendix C. We should add a section with guidelines and rules. Do you know all the sources for this list?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gzotti this list created according to few catalogs, I don’t remember all sources
@@ -1247,12 +1377,15 @@ | |||
7450|50_Cet | |||
8102|52_Cet | |||
8497|53_Cet | |||
8588|54_Cet* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
12107|80_Cet | ||
12247|81_Cet | ||
12387|82_Cet | ||
12390|83_Cet | ||
12530|84_Cet | ||
12647|85_Cet* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
12706|86_Cet | ||
12828|87_Cet | ||
12832|88_Cet* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to 38_Ari and Table of stars with Flamsteed designations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This star hasn’t asterisk in designation
@@ -1309,6 +1448,7 @@ | |||
27628|β_Col | |||
28199|γ_Col | |||
30277|δ_Col | |||
30277|3_CMa* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
according to δ Col and Table of stars with Flamsteed designations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This star hasn’t asterisk in designation!
@@ -1360,6 +1502,7 @@ | |||
62886|35_Com | |||
63355|36_Com | |||
63462|37_Com | |||
63462|13_CVn* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
63462|13_CVn* | |
63462|13_CVn* |
According to 37_Com and Table of stars with Flamsteed designations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This star hasn’t asterisk in designation
@sunshuwei please check the Chinese part of PR |
@@ -1449,19 +1592,29 @@ | |||
56802|ι_Crt | |||
55874|κ_Crt | |||
55598|λ_Crt | |||
54742|ψ_Crt | |||
53037|5_Crt* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
53740|7_Crt | ||
53963|8_Crt* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
53740|7_Crt | ||
53963|8_Crt* | ||
54477|10_Crt* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
54682|11_Crt | ||
55282|12_Crt | ||
55598|13_Crt | ||
55687|14_Crt | ||
55705|15_Crt | ||
55874|16_Crt | ||
56280|17_Crt | ||
56280|17_Crt* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
@@ -4252,6 +4670,7 @@ | |||
67231|84_UMa | |||
67301|85_UMa | |||
67848|86_UMa | |||
67627|87_UMa* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
11767|1_UMi | ||
5372|2_UMi | ||
5372|2_UMi* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
61941|29_Vir | ||
61960|30_Vir | ||
61968|31_Vir | ||
62267|32_Vir | ||
62325|33_Vir | ||
62394|34_Vir | ||
62443|35_Vir | ||
62541|36_Vir* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
69427|98_Vir | ||
69701|99_Vir | ||
69974|100_Vir | ||
69829|101_Vir* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
@@ -4506,6 +4950,7 @@ | |||
103004|31_Vul | |||
103200|32_Vul | |||
103511|33_Vul | |||
105411|34_Vul* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why asterisk added here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @alex-w that @sunshuwei, who provided a very extensive description, should please review this. Mixing sources may be problematic to begin with. (The "western" is a special case and permanent working zone...) I would prefer to have exactly one source book (or more if they agree on the figures) implemented accurately, else this becomes a hodge-podge where always one or somebody else will "fix" something "corrected" recently by somebody else.
Please remove asterisk from designations, because this file contains modern designations. |
Important note: all *.po files will be replaced by translations from Transifex! |
@lvhaocheng Please extract all related to western skyculture stuff into separate pull request. |
I will modify it later. |
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
I've checked |
@sunshuwei please check the Chinese part of PR @lvhaocheng any news for resolving conflicts and changes in the PR? |
OK |
I think it's good for me. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it not possible to resolve the duplicates? I have annotated a few, but it's getting too much.
I noticed that these are double stars indistinguishable by naked eye. |
They are each a member of a double star. Hundreds of years ago, astronomy officials used the naked eye to determine the names of stars. |
OK, in this case it may be useful to assign the name to the brighter of the pair. Else the screen is cluttered with too much text. |
Yes, I think so. |
I fixed some of them, others are open for discussion. |
Some small fixes to skycultures and star names
Description
中西对照恒星图表1950.0(星表分册)
) and The History of Stellar Observation in China (Chinese:中国恒星观测史
).中西对照恒星图表1950.0(星表分册)
) and The History of Stellar Observation in China (Chinese:中国恒星观测史
).Fixes # (issue)
Some small fixes to Chinese skyculture:
constellationship.fab
:description.zh_CN.utf8
,description.zh_HK.utf8
anddescription.zh_TW.utf8
star_names.fab
andstar_names.zh_CN.fab
:Some small fixes to Chinese Contemporary skyculture:
star_names.fab
:asterism_lines.fab
, fixed lines of Xingguans:Some small fixes to Western skyculture:
star_names.fab
, fixed HIP 42080 "Althiba I"In
stellarium/stars/default/name.fab
, updated Bayer designations and Flamsteed designations of the stars according to Wikipedia and Simbad, such as "c1_Cap", "6_Cnc*" and many othersIn
stellarium/po/stellarium-skycultures/zh_CN.po
, fixed some small problems to Chinese translation of skycultures.Screenshots (if appropriate):
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Test Configuration:
Checklist: