Third party registry setup

[DivadNojnarg]

Fix #5

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 119 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (904650f) 38.53% compared to head (7260740) 30.35%.

❗ Current head 7260740 differs from pull request most recent head 4de756e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 4de756e to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
R/utils.R	0.00%	94 Missing ⚠️
R/demo-bms-blocks.R	0.00%	25 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #8      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   38.53%   30.35%   -8.19%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         397      504     +107     
==========================================
  Hits          153      153              
- Misses        244      351     +107     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[DivadNojnarg]

@JohnCoene: can you confirm what block you need for the demo (i.e. do you still need all the demo blocks like demo_arrange_block or the outdated monolithic ggiraph/plot block)? Do you also need custom data blocks like:

lab_data_block <- function(...) {
  initialize_block(new_data_block(
    ...,
    dat = as.environment("package:blockr.data"),
    selected = "lab"
  ))
}

For now, I included all of them except the one in #9.

[JohnCoene]

@DivadNojnarg I'm not doing the demo, @karmatarap is handling that, we can confirm with him but I do not think demo blocks are needed.

[JohnCoene]

@DivadNojnarg may we merge this?

[DivadNojnarg]

Yes I was checking the blocks. The plot_code_block will also suffer from the same issue we have in {blockr} (not for ggplot).