You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
All other records in the created WARC file seem to adhere to the --fixed-dt flag if set by the user. Revisit records, automatically created by warcit based on the directory structure, are the only ones that seem to exhibit this issue.
This is possibly because revisit records use a different method of deriving warc_date than other records do. See
This issue only appears to affect revisit records as shown below.
The current URL timestamp shows the current date of WARC creation instead of the --fixed-dt date. The HTML file displays the correct date displaying the time that these website files would have been seen (according to the user of warcit).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
All other records in the created WARC file seem to adhere to the --fixed-dt flag if set by the user. Revisit records, automatically created by warcit based on the directory structure, are the only ones that seem to exhibit this issue.
This is possibly because revisit records use a different method of deriving
warc_date
than other records do. Seewarcit/warcit/warcit.py
Lines 547 to 554 in d94ecd7
warcit/warcit/warcit.py
Lines 495 to 501 in d94ecd7
Screenshot
This issue only appears to affect revisit records as shown below.
The current URL timestamp shows the current date of WARC creation instead of the
--fixed-dt
date. The HTML file displays the correct date displaying the time that these website files would have been seen (according to the user of warcit).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: