Time series forecasting with ARIMA

1. Run the notebook to load the statsmodels Python library; you will need this for ARIMA models.

2. Load necessary libraries

3. Now, load up several more libraries useful for plotting data:

   import os
   import warnings
   import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
   import numpy as np
   import pandas as pd
   import datetime as dt
   import math
   
   from pandas.plotting import autocorrelation_plot
   from statsmodels.tsa.statespace.sarimax import SARIMAX
   from sklearn.preprocessing import MinMaxScaler
   from common.utils import load_data, mape
   from IPython.display import Image
   
   %matplotlib inline
   pd.options.display.float_format = '{:,.2f}'.format
   np.set_printoptions(precision=2)
   warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") # specify to ignore warning messages

4. Load the data from the /data/energy.csv file into a Pandas dataframe and take a look:

   energy = load_data('./data')[['load']]
   energy.head(10)

5. Plot all the available energy data from January 2012 to December 2014. There should be no surprises as we saw this data in the last lesson:

   energy.plot(y='load', subplots=True, figsize=(15, 8), fontsize=12)
   plt.xlabel('timestamp', fontsize=12)
   plt.ylabel('load', fontsize=12)
   plt.show()

   Now, let's build a model!

Create training and testing datasets

Now your data is loaded, so you can separate it into train and test sets. You'll train your model on the train set. As usual, after the model has finished training, you'll evaluate its accuracy using the test set. You need to ensure that the test set covers a later period in time from the training set to ensure that the model does not gain information from future time periods.

1. Allocate a two-month period from September 1 to October 31, 2014 to the training set. The test set will include the two-month period of November 1 to December 31, 2014:

   train_start_dt = '2014-11-01 00:00:00'
   test_start_dt = '2014-12-30 00:00:00'

   Since this data reflects the daily consumption of energy, there is a strong seasonal pattern, but the consumption is most similar to the consumption in more recent days.

2. Visualize the differences:

   energy[(energy.index < test_start_dt) & (energy.index >= train_start_dt)][['load']].rename(columns={'load':'train'}) \
       .join(energy[test_start_dt:][['load']].rename(columns={'load':'test'}), how='outer') \
       .plot(y=['train', 'test'], figsize=(15, 8), fontsize=12)
   plt.xlabel('timestamp', fontsize=12)
   plt.ylabel('load', fontsize=12)
   plt.show()

   

   Therefore, using a relatively small window of time for training the data should be sufficient.

   Note: Since the function we use to fit the ARIMA model uses in-sample validation during fitting, we will omit validation data.

Prepare the data for training

Now, you need to prepare the data for training by performing filtering and scaling of your data. Filter your dataset to only include the time periods and columns you need, and scaling to ensure the data is projected in the interval 0,1.

1. Filter the original dataset to include only the aforementioned time periods per set and only including the needed column 'load' plus the date:

   train = energy.copy()[(energy.index >= train_start_dt) & (energy.index < test_start_dt)][['load']]
   test = energy.copy()[energy.index >= test_start_dt][['load']]
   
   print('Training data shape: ', train.shape)
   print('Test data shape: ', test.shape)

   You can see the shape of the data:

   Training data shape:  (1416, 1)
   Test data shape:  (48, 1)
   

2. Scale the data to be in the range (0, 1).

   scaler = MinMaxScaler()
   train['load'] = scaler.fit_transform(train)
   train.head(10)

3. Visualize the original vs. scaled data:

   energy[(energy.index >= train_start_dt) & (energy.index < test_start_dt)][['load']].rename(columns={'load':'original load'}).plot.hist(bins=100, fontsize=12)
   train.rename(columns={'load':'scaled load'}).plot.hist(bins=100, fontsize=12)
   plt.show()

   

   The original data

   

   The scaled data

4. Now that you have calibrated the scaled data, you can scale the test data:

   test['load'] = scaler.transform(test)
   test.head()

Implement ARIMA

It's time to implement ARIMA! You'll now use the statsmodels library that you installed earlier.

Now you need to follow several steps

1. Define the model by calling SARIMAX() and passing in the model parameters: p, d, and q parameters, and P, D, and Q parameters.
2. Prepare the model for the training data by calling the fit() function.
3. Make predictions calling the forecast() function and specifying the number of steps (the horizon) to forecast.

🎓 What are all these parameters for? In an ARIMA model there are 3 parameters that are used to help model the major aspects of a time series: seasonality, trend, and noise. These parameters are:

p: the parameter associated with the auto-regressive aspect of the model, which incorporates past values. d: the parameter associated with the integrated part of the model, which affects the amount of differencing (🎓 remember differencing 👆?) to apply to a time series. q: the parameter associated with the moving-average part of the model.

Note: If your data has a seasonal aspect - which this one does - , we use a seasonal ARIMA model (SARIMA). In that case you need to use another set of parameters: P, D, and Q which describe the same associations as p, d, and q, but correspond to the seasonal components of the model.

1. Start by setting your preferred horizon value. Let's try 3 hours:

   # Specify the number of steps to forecast ahead
   HORIZON = 3
   print('Forecasting horizon:', HORIZON, 'hours')

   Selecting the best values for an ARIMA model's parameters can be challenging as it's somewhat subjective and time intensive. You might consider using an auto_arima() function from the pyramid library,

2. For now try some manual selections to find a good model.

   order = (4, 1, 0)
   seasonal_order = (1, 1, 0, 24)
   
   model = SARIMAX(endog=train, order=order, seasonal_order=seasonal_order)
   results = model.fit()
   
   print(results.summary())

   A table of results is printed.

You've built your first model! Now we need to find a way to evaluate it.

Evaluate your model

To evaluate your model, you can perform the so-called walk forward validation. In practice, time series models are re-trained each time a new data becomes available. This allows the model to make the best forecast at each time step.

Starting at the beginning of the time series using this technique, train the model on the train data set. Then make a prediction on the next time step. The prediction is evaluated against the known value. The training set is then expanded to include the known value and the process is repeated.

Note: You should keep the training set window fixed for more efficient training so that every time you add a new observation to the training set, you remove the observation from the beginning of the set.

This process provides a more robust estimation of how the model will perform in practice. However, it comes at the computation cost of creating so many models. This is acceptable if the data is small or if the model is simple, but could be an issue at scale.

Walk-forward validation is the gold standard of time series model evaluation and is recommended for your own projects.

1. First, create a test data point for each HORIZON step.

   test_shifted = test.copy()
   
   for t in range(1, HORIZON+1):
       test_shifted['load+'+str(t)] = test_shifted['load'].shift(-t, freq='H')
   
   test_shifted = test_shifted.dropna(how='any')
   test_shifted.head(5)

   		load	load+1	load+2
   2014-12-30	00:00:00	0.33	0.29	0.27
   2014-12-30	01:00:00	0.29	0.27	0.27
   2014-12-30	02:00:00	0.27	0.27	0.30
   2014-12-30	03:00:00	0.27	0.30	0.41
   2014-12-30	04:00:00	0.30	0.41	0.57

   The data is shifted horizontally according to its horizon point.

2. Make predictions on your test data using this sliding window approach in a loop the size of the test data length:

   %%time
   training_window = 720 # dedicate 30 days (720 hours) for training
   
   train_ts = train['load']
   test_ts = test_shifted
   
   history = [x for x in train_ts]
   history = history[(-training_window):]
   
   predictions = list()
   
   order = (2, 1, 0)
   seasonal_order = (1, 1, 0, 24)
   
   for t in range(test_ts.shape[0]):
       model = SARIMAX(endog=history, order=order, seasonal_order=seasonal_order)
       model_fit = model.fit()
       yhat = model_fit.forecast(steps = HORIZON)
       predictions.append(yhat)
       obs = list(test_ts.iloc[t])
       # move the training window
       history.append(obs[0])
       history.pop(0)
       print(test_ts.index[t])
       print(t+1, ': predicted =', yhat, 'expected =', obs)

   You can watch the training occurring:

   2014-12-30 00:00:00
   1 : predicted = [0.32 0.29 0.28] expected = [0.32945389435989236, 0.2900626678603402, 0.2739480752014323]
   
   2014-12-30 01:00:00
   2 : predicted = [0.3  0.29 0.3 ] expected = [0.2900626678603402, 0.2739480752014323, 0.26812891674127126]
   
   2014-12-30 02:00:00
   3 : predicted = [0.27 0.28 0.32] expected = [0.2739480752014323, 0.26812891674127126, 0.3025962399283795]
   

3. Compare the predictions to the actual load:

   eval_df = pd.DataFrame(predictions, columns=['t+'+str(t) for t in range(1, HORIZON+1)])
   eval_df['timestamp'] = test.index[0:len(test.index)-HORIZON+1]
   eval_df = pd.melt(eval_df, id_vars='timestamp', value_name='prediction', var_name='h')
   eval_df['actual'] = np.array(np.transpose(test_ts)).ravel()
   eval_df[['prediction', 'actual']] = scaler.inverse_transform(eval_df[['prediction', 'actual']])
   eval_df.head()

   Output

   		timestamp	h	prediction	actual
   0	2014-12-30	00:00:00	t+1	3,008.74	3,023.00
   1	2014-12-30	01:00:00	t+1	2,955.53	2,935.00
   2	2014-12-30	02:00:00	t+1	2,900.17	2,899.00
   3	2014-12-30	03:00:00	t+1	2,917.69	2,886.00
   4	2014-12-30	04:00:00	t+1	2,946.99	2,963.00

   Observe the hourly data's prediction, compared to the actual load. How accurate is this?

Check model accuracy

Check the accuracy of your model by testing its mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) over all the predictions.

🧮 Show me the math

MAPE is used to show prediction accuracy as a ratio defined by the above formula. The difference between actual_t and predicted_t is divided by the actual_t. "The absolute value in this calculation is summed for every forecasted point in time and divided by the number of fitted points n." wikipedia

1. Express equation in code:

   if(HORIZON > 1):
       eval_df['APE'] = (eval_df['prediction'] - eval_df['actual']).abs() / eval_df['actual']
       print(eval_df.groupby('h')['APE'].mean())

2. Calculate one step's MAPE:

   print('One step forecast MAPE: ', (mape(eval_df[eval_df['h'] == 't+1']['prediction'], eval_df[eval_df['h'] == 't+1']['actual']))*100, '%')

   One step forecast MAPE: 0.5570581332313952 %

3. Print the multi-step forecast MAPE:

   print('Multi-step forecast MAPE: ', mape(eval_df['prediction'], eval_df['actual'])*100, '%')

   Multi-step forecast MAPE:  1.1460048657704118 %
   

   A nice low number is best: consider that a forecast that has a MAPE of 10 is off by 10%.

4. But as always, it's easier to see this kind of accuracy measurement visually, so let's plot it:

    if(HORIZON == 1):
       ## Plotting single step forecast
       eval_df.plot(x='timestamp', y=['actual', 'prediction'], style=['r', 'b'], figsize=(15, 8))
   
   else:
       ## Plotting multi step forecast
       plot_df = eval_df[(eval_df.h=='t+1')][['timestamp', 'actual']]
       for t in range(1, HORIZON+1):
           plot_df['t+'+str(t)] = eval_df[(eval_df.h=='t+'+str(t))]['prediction'].values
   
       fig = plt.figure(figsize=(15, 8))
       ax = plt.plot(plot_df['timestamp'], plot_df['actual'], color='red', linewidth=4.0)
       ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
       for t in range(1, HORIZON+1):
           x = plot_df['timestamp'][(t-1):]
           y = plot_df['t+'+str(t)][0:len(x)]
           ax.plot(x, y, color='blue', linewidth=4*math.pow(.9,t), alpha=math.pow(0.8,t))
   
       ax.legend(loc='best')
   
   plt.xlabel('timestamp', fontsize=12)
   plt.ylabel('load', fontsize=12)
   plt.show()

   

🏆 A very nice plot, showing a model with good accuracy. Well done!