Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
changed caption and figure width
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
walkeronwater committed Jan 15, 2021
1 parent 6e69db9 commit f6ea101
Showing 1 changed file with 14 additions and 14 deletions.
28 changes: 14 additions & 14 deletions 14_team6_agentdesign/index.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -359,9 +359,9 @@ \section{Evaluation} \label{sec:Team6_Evaluation}
\subsection{Foraging} \label{subsec:Team6_Eval_Foraging}

From the simulation results of the foraging part shown in Figure~\ref{fig:foraging}, we could conclude that the foraging team of the whole system has always been able to provide stable resources supply. Fish contributes very little to resources in the early stage. Also, the resources supply of different prey can vary greatly, but we manage to decide which type and how many of the prey to hunt to keep the resources input balance.
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=12cm]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/foraging.png}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/foraging.png}
\caption{Foraging Visualisation}
\label{fig:foraging}
\end{figure}
Expand All @@ -371,9 +371,9 @@ \subsection{Distribution of Roles} \label{subsec:Team6_Eval_Roles}
In this simulation result, we could see from Figure~\ref{fig:roles} that our agent is more active in government activities and spends more time managing government departments in the early stage. As time goes by, we are gaining less and less political power and Team 1 becomes the power house instead. This is basically consistent with what we expect to see in design level, because holding government roles could reduce our resources storage due to the cost of actions and will not be always beneficial to us.

However, our voting strategy will not contribute that much to the election results, which is likely to be influenced by other islands' voting strategies and looks quite different from what we expected to see.
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=12cm]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/roles.png}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/roles.png}
\caption{Distribution of Roles}
\label{fig:roles}
\end{figure}
Expand All @@ -382,9 +382,9 @@ \subsection{Distribution of Roles} \label{subsec:Team6_Eval_Roles}
\subsection{IIGO Payments} \label{subsec:Team6_Eval_IIGO}

In Figure~\ref{fig:IIGO}, compared to other islands, we manage to run with a lower expected tax level and actually paid more than that. Moreover, we never take more resources than allocated by President and never break the rule, which is also one of our advantages, as we don’t have to waste our resources in sanction payments for breaking rules. By doing this, we reduce the risk of common pool resource exhaustion in a short time, which contributes to the stability and sustainability for the whole system.\\
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=12cm]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/IIGO cost.png}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/IIGO cost.png}
\caption{IIGO Costs}
\label{fig:IIGO}
\end{figure}
Expand All @@ -393,9 +393,9 @@ \subsection{IITO visualisation} \label{subsec:Team6_Eval_IITO}
The following plot shown in Figure~\ref{fig:IITO} visualises the transactions between islands in the IITO sessions. The size of a bubble represents the total magnitude of resources traded by each island. The width of each connecting edge between two islands represents the magnitude of transactions between the two islands. Islands that gave more resources than they receive are indicated by a red border, while islands that received more than they gave are indicated by a green border.

From the plot we could conclude that resources we have received are more than that given by us. Also, our bubble is the penultimate small one, which indicates that we are somewhat inclined to be self-isolated and lack of trade exchanges with other islands. This also could indicate that the friendship with other islands is somewhat not getting along really good based on our own opinion formation towards the other islands.
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=8cm]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/IITO.png}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/IITO.png}
\caption{IITO Visualisation}
\label{fig:IITO}
\end{figure}
Expand All @@ -405,16 +405,16 @@ \subsection{Resources over time} \label{subsec:Team6_Eval_Resources}
Line charts listed in Figure~\ref{fig:all teams} show the changes about resources on each island and the common pool, as well as the sum of all resources over time. From the simulation results, we could conclude that every island manages to survive long enough, which indicates that our agent adapts well to the operation of the entire system and could automatically take advantage of situations in different specific situations.

In addition, the resources change curve of our agent as seen in Figure~\ref{fig:team 6} is much smoother than that of some other agents, which shows that we actually have a good grasp of balancing out between income and expenditure of our resources. \\
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=15cm]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/resources 1.png}
\caption{Island6 Resources}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/resources 1.png}
\caption{Dynamic Resources Level of Our Agent from Simulation}
\label{fig:team 6}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htp]
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=15cm]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/resources 2.png}
\caption{All Islands Resources}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{14_team6_agentdesign/images/resources 2.png}
\caption{Dynamic Resources Level of All Agents from Simulation}
\label{fig:all teams}
\end{figure}

Expand Down

0 comments on commit f6ea101

Please sign in to comment.