Initial potential editor drafts of core and sparql #167
Conversation
These will contain various respec errors esp due to unreferenced definitions. This is intentional as these documents are the minimal starting point from the original spec (which was a combination of the two separate documents and thus has all definitions in a single place). My goal here is to make sure that the initial documents do not have any content changes from the 1.0 starting point, as any such changes need to go through the proper W3C process.
|
Also who are the owners and committers of this github repo now? I tried to add the WG chairs as reviewers but I don't see their user names here - mainly the members of the old SHACL 1.0 WG. |
:) |
|
Hi Simon, I assume at this stage it's safe to add the two chairs @nicholascar and @PapoutsoglouE as admins - does this make sense @caribouW3 ? |
|
I've added them directly as admins as I couldn't figure out how to add them to the admin team: edit:
;( |
|
I have cleaned up the teams and used ones that are automatically sync'd with the W3C WG. (this is not really related to the original issue, let's stop discussing GH config now.) |
These will contain various respec errors esp due to unreferenced definitions. This is intentional as these documents are the minimal starting point from the original spec (which was a combination of the two separate documents and thus has all definitions in a single place). My goal here is to make sure that the initial documents do not have any content changes from the 1.0 starting point, as any such changes need to go through the proper W3C process.