Updated library for latest Haskell package versions #3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you for the PR @them492017; Does this also fix #1 ? |
|
No, I wasn't able to fix #1. I get the same "Could not find module" error. |
|
@them492017 Thank you for the changes. I will merge them now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The main changes are using Language.Haskell.Exts instead of Language.Haskell.Exts.Annotated, and then accounting for changes in the type definitions in Language.Haskell.Exts.
Additionally, I have modified the sample and sampleF test cases since it appears that the return value of [2,4] is correct.