-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/threads #92
Feat/threads #92
Conversation
if isinstance(text, list): | ||
# Thread | ||
previous_tweet_id = None | ||
for tweet in text: | ||
if not previous_tweet_id: | ||
response = api.create_tweet(text=tweet) | ||
else: | ||
response = api.create_tweet(text=tweet, in_reply_to_tweet_id=previous_tweet_id) | ||
previous_tweet_id = response.data["id"] | ||
else: | ||
# Single tweet | ||
response = api.create_tweet(text=text) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thread implementation: if the data passed is a list, we post it as a thread.
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ extra: | |||
termination_sleep: ${TERMINATION_SLEEP:int:900} | |||
reset_pause_duration: ${RESET_PAUSE_DURATION:int:300} | |||
on_chain_service_id: ${ON_CHAIN_SERVICE_ID:int:null} | |||
reset_tendermint_after: ${RESET_TENDERMINT_AFTER:int:300} | |||
reset_tendermint_after: ${RESET_TENDERMINT_AFTER:int:30} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small config fix
Event.NO_MAJORITY: TwitterRandomnessRound, | ||
Event.ROUND_TIMEOUT: TwitterRandomnessRound, | ||
}, | ||
TwitterHashtagsCollectionRound: { | ||
Event.DONE: TwitterDecisionMakingRound, | ||
Event.DONE_MAX_RETRIES: TwitterDecisionMakingRound, | ||
Event.API_ERROR: TwitterHashtagsCollectionRound, | ||
Event.NO_MAJORITY: TwitterHashtagsCollectionRound, | ||
Event.ROUND_TIMEOUT: TwitterHashtagsCollectionRound, | ||
Event.NO_MAJORITY: TwitterRandomnessRound, | ||
Event.ROUND_TIMEOUT: TwitterRandomnessRound, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should select new keepers whenever we time out. I found an issue today where the service was stuck in a timeout loop.
Proposed changes
Fixes
n/a
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce? (A breaking change is a fix or feature that would cause existing functionality and APIs to not work as expected.)
Put an
x
in the box that appliesChecklist
Put an
x
in the boxes that apply.main
branch (left side). Also you should start your branch off ourmain
.Further comments
n/a