Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add function_checksum_is #153

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

marco44
Copy link
Contributor

@marco44 marco44 commented Feb 3, 2018

Hi, As discussed in theory/tap-parser-sourcehandler-pgtap#18, here is a PR to add function_checksum_is

I didn't like joining to pg_proc, but couldn't find a better idea without extending tap_funky.

@cbandy
Copy link

cbandy commented Feb 3, 2018

I wonder... With pgTAP, shouldn't one be checking the behavior of a function?

This seems more like an audit rule than test assertion.

@theory
Copy link
Owner

theory commented Feb 3, 2018

Awesome, care to add some tests to test/sql/functap.sql?

@theory
Copy link
Owner

theory commented Feb 3, 2018

@cbandy pgTAP has no religion about the type of testing you do, but likes to give you the tools to do your testing well.

@marco44
Copy link
Contributor Author

marco44 commented Feb 27, 2018

Took me a while, but here it is :)

@theory
Copy link
Owner

theory commented Feb 27, 2018

Look unhappy on Postgres 10. :-(

@marco44
Copy link
Contributor Author

marco44 commented Feb 27, 2018

Yes but is seems to fail on partitions… which I didn't touch...

@marco44 marco44 mentioned this pull request Mar 23, 2018
@marco44 marco44 force-pushed the function_checksum_is branch from 6e301e1 to 46665c7 Compare March 23, 2018 10:57
@marco44 marco44 force-pushed the function_checksum_is branch from 46665c7 to 29dea23 Compare March 23, 2018 15:00
@theory theory self-requested a review November 20, 2018 22:41
@theory theory self-assigned this Nov 20, 2018
@theory theory removed their request for review November 20, 2018 22:41
@nasbyj
Copy link
Collaborator

nasbyj commented Nov 14, 2019

Please merge master; it has fixes for some bugs as well as much better test capabilities.

@nasbyj
Copy link
Collaborator

nasbyj commented Nov 19, 2019

Also, this needs documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants