Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't use obal to git branch & commit + unify bump packages #254

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2023

Conversation

ekohl
Copy link
Member

@ekohl ekohl commented Aug 23, 2023

Obal uses a complex branch name and an obscure commit message. This simplifies the whole workflow and brings it more in line with the Debian side. After bringing those closer together, the next script introduces a common bump_packaging script. The old scripts remain as very light wrappers. The last commit is only there to make shellcheck happy. In practice it wouldn't have been any problem since package names never have spaces, but it's still a good practice.

@ekohl
Copy link
Member Author

ekohl commented Sep 5, 2023

I used this (together with #207) for foreman-3.8.0-rc1: theforeman/foreman-packaging#9766 & theforeman/foreman-packaging#9767. And looks like that failed on RPM, so moving back to draft.

@ekohl ekohl marked this pull request as draft September 5, 2023 17:20
This correctly handles spaces, even though package names should never
have spaces.
Obal uses a complex branch name and an obscure commit message. This
simplifies the whole workflow and brings it more in line with the Debian
side.
@ekohl ekohl marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2023 17:34
@ekohl
Copy link
Member Author

ekohl commented Sep 5, 2023

Now updated and I tested it with RPMs where it previously didn't add the files that obal changed.

@ekohl ekohl requested a review from evgeni September 5, 2023 17:35
@ekohl ekohl merged commit d27cef5 into theforeman:master Oct 18, 2023
3 checks passed
@ekohl ekohl deleted the unify-packaging branch October 18, 2023 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants