-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extend the filter()
documentation slightly
#235
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for improving the docs. Added a couple of questions and suggestions.
filter()
documentation slightly
Depends on #220, we have to adjust docs once that is merged. |
Thanks for the fix, Petre, let me also rebase it now. |
Thanks for the rebase, going to squash the changes now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the docs improvement!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One nitpick, but no point in blocking on that
People tend to try using parentheses in their filter expressions for obvious reasons. But it is not possible. I feel like this should be mentioned in the documentation. In fact, with DNF you never need parentheses to express any expression and I think this fact also needs to be noted there. Signed-off-by: Ondrej Moris <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Petr Šplíchal <[email protected]>
People tend to try using parentheses in their filter expressions for obvious reasons. But it is not possible. I feel like this should be mentioned in the documentation. In fact, with DNF you never need parentheses to express any expression and I think this fact also needs to be noted there.