-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 587
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add C implementation for stats/base/dists/discrete-uniform/logpmf
#4663
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: add C implementation for stats/base/dists/discrete-uniform/logpmf
#4663
Conversation
--- type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report: - task: lint_filenames status: passed - task: lint_editorconfig status: passed - task: lint_markdown status: passed - task: lint_package_json status: passed - task: lint_repl_help status: na - task: lint_javascript_src status: passed - task: lint_javascript_cli status: na - task: lint_javascript_examples status: na - task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed - task: lint_python status: na - task: lint_r status: na - task: lint_c_src status: passed - task: lint_c_examples status: passed - task: lint_c_benchmarks status: passed - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na - task: lint_shell status: na - task: lint_typescript_declarations status: na - task: lint_typescript_tests status: na - task: lint_license_headers status: passed --- --- type: pre_push_report description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes. report: - task: run_javascript_examples status: na - task: run_c_examples status: na - task: run_cpp_examples status: na - task: run_javascript_readme_examples status: na - task: run_c_benchmarks status: na - task: run_cpp_benchmarks status: na - task: run_fortran_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_benchmarks status: na - task: run_julia_benchmarks status: na - task: run_python_benchmarks status: na - task: run_r_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_tests status: na ---
Coverage Report
The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR. |
--- type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report: - task: lint_filenames status: passed - task: lint_editorconfig status: passed - task: lint_markdown status: passed - task: lint_package_json status: na - task: lint_repl_help status: na - task: lint_javascript_src status: na - task: lint_javascript_cli status: na - task: lint_javascript_examples status: na - task: lint_javascript_tests status: na - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_python status: na - task: lint_r status: na - task: lint_c_src status: passed - task: lint_c_examples status: na - task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na - task: lint_shell status: na - task: lint_typescript_declarations status: na - task: lint_typescript_tests status: na - task: lint_license_headers status: passed --- --- type: pre_push_report description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes. report: - task: run_javascript_examples status: na - task: run_c_examples status: na - task: run_cpp_examples status: na - task: run_javascript_readme_examples status: passed - task: run_c_benchmarks status: na - task: run_cpp_benchmarks status: na - task: run_fortran_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_benchmarks status: na - task: run_julia_benchmarks status: na - task: run_python_benchmarks status: na - task: run_r_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_tests status: na ---
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking great!
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/stats/base/dists/discrete-uniform/logpmf/src/main.c
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…pmf/src/main.c Signed-off-by: Philipp Burckhardt <[email protected]>
PR Commit Message
Please review the above commit message and make any necessary adjustments. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only realized when looking at logpmf
, but there and here we should ensure the example and benchmark x
values are integers. Otherwise, we only end up hitting the code path where the PMF evaluates to zero.
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/stats/base/dists/discrete-uniform/logpmf/README.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/stats/base/dists/discrete-uniform/logpmf/benchmark/c/benchmark.c
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/stats/base/dists/discrete-uniform/logpmf/benchmark/benchmark.native.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/stats/base/dists/discrete-uniform/logpmf/benchmark/benchmark.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
--- type: pre_push_report description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes. report: - task: run_javascript_examples status: na - task: run_c_examples status: passed - task: run_cpp_examples status: na - task: run_javascript_readme_examples status: passed - task: run_c_benchmarks status: passed - task: run_cpp_benchmarks status: na - task: run_fortran_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_benchmarks status: passed - task: run_julia_benchmarks status: na - task: run_python_benchmarks status: na - task: run_r_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_tests status: na ---
@Planeshifter I made all the changes as per given review. Please took into those and merge this pr. Thank you. |
Resolves #3553
Description
This pull request:
Related Issues
This pull request:
@stdlib/stats/base/dists/discrete-uniform/logpmf
#3553Questions
No.
Other
No.
Checklist
@stdlib-js/reviewers