Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore_: remove wakuv1 and wakuv2 wrappers #6273

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

osmaczko
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@osmaczko osmaczko self-assigned this Jan 21, 2025
@osmaczko osmaczko force-pushed the chore/remove-waku-api-wrappers branch from eab61cc to 45fc2c6 Compare January 21, 2025 20:45
@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

status-im-auto commented Jan 21, 2025

Jenkins Builds

Click to see older builds (11)
Commit #️⃣ Finished (UTC) Duration Platform Result
✔️ eab61cc #1 2025-01-21 20:48:30 ~4 min macos 📦zip
✔️ eab61cc #1 2025-01-21 20:48:38 ~4 min windows 📦zip
✔️ eab61cc #1 2025-01-21 20:48:46 ~4 min ios 📦zip
✔️ eab61cc #1 2025-01-21 20:49:35 ~5 min linux 📦zip
✔️ eab61cc #1 2025-01-21 20:49:44 ~5 min android 📦aar
✔️ eab61cc #1 2025-01-21 20:49:55 ~5 min macos 📦zip
✔️ eab61cc #1 2025-01-21 20:50:23 ~6 min tests-rpc 📄log
✖️ eab61cc #1 2025-01-21 21:15:17 ~31 min tests 📄log
✔️ 45fc2c6 #2 2025-01-21 20:51:30 ~2 min windows 📦zip
✔️ 45fc2c6 #2 2025-01-21 20:52:44 ~4 min macos 📦zip
✔️ 45fc2c6 #2 2025-01-21 20:53:24 ~4 min ios 📦zip
Commit #️⃣ Finished (UTC) Duration Platform Result
✔️ 228d40b #3 2025-01-21 20:54:25 ~2 min windows 📦zip
✔️ 228d40b #2 2025-01-21 20:54:26 ~4 min linux 📦zip
✔️ 228d40b #2 2025-01-21 20:55:17 ~5 min android 📦aar
✔️ 228d40b #2 2025-01-21 20:55:19 ~5 min macos 📦zip
✔️ 228d40b #2 2025-01-21 20:56:16 ~5 min tests-rpc 📄log
✔️ 228d40b #3 2025-01-21 20:57:06 ~4 min macos 📦zip
✔️ 228d40b #3 2025-01-21 20:58:03 ~4 min ios 📦zip
✖️ 228d40b #2 2025-01-21 21:46:00 ~30 min tests 📄log
✔️ c22db18 #4 2025-01-22 14:12:43 ~2 min windows 📦zip
✔️ c22db18 #4 2025-01-22 14:14:06 ~4 min macos 📦zip
✔️ c22db18 #4 2025-01-22 14:14:12 ~4 min ios 📦zip
✔️ c22db18 #3 2025-01-22 14:14:42 ~5 min linux 📦zip
✔️ c22db18 #3 2025-01-22 14:15:14 ~5 min macos 📦zip
✔️ c22db18 #3 2025-01-22 14:16:16 ~6 min tests-rpc 📄log
✔️ c22db18 #3 2025-01-22 14:16:48 ~7 min android 📦aar
✖️ c22db18 #3 2025-01-22 14:39:12 ~29 min tests 📄log
✔️ c22db18 #4 2025-01-22 15:32:58 ~29 min tests 📄log

@osmaczko osmaczko force-pushed the chore/remove-waku-api-wrappers branch from 45fc2c6 to 228d40b Compare January 21, 2025 20:49
Copy link
Contributor

@chaitanyaprem chaitanyaprem left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wondering if we need to keep wakuv1. since we are refactoring anyways, why not remove it and just have waku and use it directly. i am sure a lot of unused code will get deleted as well this way.
also wakuv1 is removed from underlying waku repo anyways already.

but @richard-ramos will have better idea than me on this topic though

@osmaczko
Copy link
Contributor Author

wondering if we need to keep wakuv1. since we are refactoring anyways, why not remove it and just have waku and use it directly. i am sure a lot of unused code will get deleted as well this way. also wakuv1 is removed from underlying waku repo anyways already.

but @richard-ramos will have better idea than me on this topic though

This would be the next step, but it is not trivial because nearly all protocol tests depend on wakuv1.

@richard-ramos
Copy link
Member

wondering if we need to keep wakuv1. since we are refactoring anyways, why not remove it and just have waku and use it directly. i am sure a lot of unused code will get deleted as well this way.
also wakuv1 is removed from underlying waku repo anyways already.

Ideally we'd remove it, yes. The annoying part is that some tests depend on a storenode that's created on the fly, so that means that some tests would need to be modified to use a nwaku node via docker.

@osmaczko osmaczko force-pushed the chore/remove-waku-api-wrappers branch from 228d40b to c22db18 Compare January 22, 2025 14:09
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 43.90244% with 184 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 61.79%. Comparing base (3e0b1b2) to head (c22db18).
Report is 13 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
wakuv1/waku_unsupported.go 3.27% 59 Missing ⚠️
wakuv1/bridge.go 30.43% 47 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
wakuv2/bridge.go 33.33% 26 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
wakuv2/waku.go 80.95% 14 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
wakuv1/waku.go 80.00% 5 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
protocol/messenger_testing_utils.go 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
wakuv1/api.go 25.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
wakuv2/waku_unsupported.go 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
waku/types/topic.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
wakuv1/common/filter.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
... and 2 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6273      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    61.92%   61.79%   -0.14%     
===========================================
  Files          843      840       -3     
  Lines       111286   111156     -130     
===========================================
- Hits         68918    68685     -233     
- Misses       34388    34499     +111     
+ Partials      7980     7972       -8     
Flag Coverage Δ
functional 21.52% <25.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
unit 60.28% <43.29%> (-0.13%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
eth-node/bridge/geth/node.go 24.24% <100.00%> (ø)
mailserver/mailserver.go 36.32% <100.00%> (ø)
waku/types/waku.go 66.66% <ø> (ø)
wakuv1/common/filter.go 81.10% <0.00%> (-1.30%) ⬇️
wakuv2/api.go 38.26% <50.00%> (ø)
wakuv2/common/filter.go 71.63% <0.00%> (-0.32%) ⬇️
waku/types/topic.go 83.67% <0.00%> (-5.46%) ⬇️
wakuv2/waku_unsupported.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
protocol/messenger_testing_utils.go 59.62% <0.00%> (-0.38%) ⬇️
wakuv1/api.go 36.29% <25.00%> (ø)
... and 5 more

... and 37 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Code Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants