Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-import to v2.29.1 #147

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 1, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint-plugin-import 2.26.0 -> 2.29.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

import-js/eslint-plugin-import (eslint-plugin-import)

v2.29.1

Compare Source

Fixed

v2.29.0

Compare Source

Added

v2.28.1

Compare Source

Fixed
Changed

v2.28.0

Compare Source

Fixed
  • [no-duplicates]: remove duplicate identifiers in duplicate imports ([#​2577], thanks [@​joe-matsec])
  • [consistent-type-specifier-style]: fix accidental removal of comma in certain cases ([#​2754], thanks [@​bradzacher])
  • [Perf] ExportMap: Improve ExportMap.for performance on larger codebases ([#​2756], thanks [@​leipert])
  • [no-extraneous-dependencies]/TypeScript: do not error when importing inline type from dev dependencies ([#​1820], thanks [@​andyogo])
  • [newline-after-import]/TypeScript: do not error when re-exporting a namespaced import ([#​2832], thanks [@​laurens-dg])
  • [order]: partial fix for [#​2687] (thanks [@​ljharb])
  • [no-duplicates]: Detect across type and regular imports ([#​2835], thanks [@​benkrejci])
  • [extensions]: handle . and .. properly ([#​2778], thanks [@​benasher44])
  • [no-unused-modules]: improve schema (thanks [@​ljharb])
  • [no-unused-modules]: report error on binding instead of parent export ([#​2842], thanks [@​Chamion])
Changed
  • [Docs] [no-duplicates]: fix example schema ([#​2684], thanks [@​simmo])
  • [Docs] [group-exports]: fix syntax highlighting ([#​2699], thanks [@​devinrhode2])
  • [Docs] [extensions]: reference node ESM behavior ([#​2748], thanks [@​xM8WVqaG])
  • [Refactor] [exports-last]: use array.prototype.findlastindex (thanks [@​ljharb])
  • [Refactor] [no-anonymous-default-export]: use object.fromentries (thanks [@​ljharb])
  • [Refactor] [no-unused-modules]: use array.prototype.flatmap (thanks [@​ljharb])

v2.27.5

Compare Source

Fixed

v2.27.4

Compare Source

Fixed
  • semver should be a prod dep ([#​2668])

v2.27.3

Compare Source

Fixed
  • [no-empty-named-blocks]: rewrite rule to only check import declarations ([#​2666])

v2.27.2

Compare Source

Fixed
  • [no-duplicates]: do not unconditionally require typescript ([#​2665])

v2.27.1

Compare Source

Fixed

v2.27.0

Compare Source

Added
Fixed
Changed

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every month" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

This PR has 2 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -1
Percentile : 0.8%

Total files changed: 2

Change summary by file extension:
.json : +1 -1
.lock : +0 -0

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@spa5k spa5k deleted the branch next July 1, 2024 11:23
@spa5k spa5k closed this Jul 1, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/eslint-plugin-import-2.x branch July 1, 2024 11:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant