Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalize names used in the artifact processor pipeline #1933

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: features/unification-artifacts
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sfc-gh-bdufour
Copy link
Contributor

@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour commented Dec 6, 2024

Pre-review checklist

  • I've confirmed that instructions included in README.md are still correct after my changes in the codebase.
  • (N/A) I've added or updated automated unit tests to verify correctness of my new code.
  • (N/A) I've added or updated integration tests to verify correctness of my new code.
  • I've confirmed that my changes are working by executing CLI's commands manually on MacOS.
  • I've confirmed that my changes are working by executing CLI's commands manually on Windows.
  • I've confirmed that my changes are up-to-date with the target branch.
  • (N/A) I've described my changes in the release notes.
  • I've described my changes in the section below.

Changes description

Refactoring names using the processor pipeline to be more general. This is in preparation for moving processor logic to a common module (and out of native apps)

Verified through grep that all occurrences of the terms being changes here have been replaced.

Comment on lines +25 to 26
class ArtifactProcessorContext:
package_name: str
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NB: this will be refactored next

@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2024 19:28
@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour requested review from a team as code owners December 6, 2024 19:28
sfc-gh-astus and others added 9 commits December 9, 2024 13:08
* Added glob support for Snowpark and Streamlit

* Added glob support for Snowpark and Streamlit

* Added glob support for Snowpark and Streamlit

* Changed PathMapping.src to Path

* Changes after review

* Changes after review 2

* Revert "Changed PathMapping.src to Path"

This reverts commit 3eb543d.

* Changes after review 3

* Changes after review 4

* Added full global support

* Renamed feature flag and added release notes

* Removed or None
@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour force-pushed the bdufour-artifacts-generalize-names branch from 4753ff4 to 17e4b2a Compare December 9, 2024 22:53
@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour changed the base branch from bdufour/unification-artifacts to features/unification-artifacts December 9, 2024 22:54
@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour changed the base branch from features/unification-artifacts to main December 9, 2024 23:16
@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour changed the base branch from main to features/unification-artifacts December 9, 2024 23:17
@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour changed the base branch from features/unification-artifacts to main December 9, 2024 23:17
@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour marked this pull request as draft December 9, 2024 23:19
@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour changed the base branch from main to features/unification-artifacts December 9, 2024 23:21
@sfc-gh-bdufour sfc-gh-bdufour marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2024 00:55
@sfc-gh-astus sfc-gh-astus force-pushed the features/unification-artifacts branch 2 times, most recently from 2bee685 to c15cca5 Compare December 13, 2024 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants