Skip to content

Issues: sherlock-audit/2024-08-cork-protocol-judging

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

18 Open 289 Closed
18 Open 289 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

vinica_boy - Providing liquidity to the AMM does not check the return value of actually provided tokens leading to locked funds. Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability Medium A Medium severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#240 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin2
2
0x73696d616f - Rebasing tokens are not supported contrary to the readme and will lead to loss of funds Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability Medium A Medium severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Disputed The sponsor disputed this issue's validity Won't Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will not be fixed
#235 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin2
1
0x73696d616f - Withdrawing all lv before expiry will lead to lost funds in the Vault Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability Medium A Medium severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#211 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin2
3
0x73696d616f - VaultPoolLib::reserve() will store the Pa not attributed to user withdrawals incorrectly and leave in untracked once it expires again Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Won't Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will not be fixed
#191 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin3
2
sakshamguruji - Attacker Can Decide The Initialization Ratio Of The AMM Pair Escalation Resolved This issue's escalations have been approved/rejected Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability Medium A Medium severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Disputed The sponsor disputed this issue's validity Won't Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will not be fixed
#186 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin4
50
0x73696d616f - Admin will not be able to upgrade the smart contracts, breaking core functionality and rendering the upgradeable contracts useless Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability Medium A Medium severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#185 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin4
2
0x73696d616f - Admin will not be able to only pause deposits in the Vault due to incorrect check leading to DoSed withdrawals Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability Medium A Medium severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#182 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin4
2
0x73696d616f - Users redeeming early will withdraw Ra without decreasing the amount locked, which will lead to stolen funds when withdrawing after expiry Escalation Resolved This issue's escalations have been approved/rejected Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#166 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin3
15
0x73696d616f - Attackers will steal the reserve from the Vault by receiving ra in FlashSwapRouter::__swapDsforRa() Escalation Resolved This issue's escalations have been approved/rejected Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#161 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin3
15
0x73696d616f - Admin new issuance or user calling Vault::redeemExpiredLv() after Psm::redeemWithCt() will lead to stuck funds when trying to withdraw Escalation Resolved This issue's escalations have been approved/rejected High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#156 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin4
24
vinica_boy - Wrong accounting of locked RA when repurchasing DS+PA with RA Escalation Resolved This issue's escalations have been approved/rejected Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#155 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin4
11
0x73696d616f - Users will steal excess funds from the Vault due to VaultPoolLib::redeem() not always decreasing self.withdrawalPool.raBalance and self.withdrawalPool.paBalance Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Won't Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will not be fixed
#144 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin2
1
Pheonix - Incoming Redemption Assets not being tracked when repurchase is called Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#126 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin4
3
sakshamguruji - Incorrect redeemAmount Is Accounted Due To Not Accounting For The Exchange Rate Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#119 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin2
2
dimulski - LV token holders receive proportional fees, when they shouldn't Escalation Resolved This issue's escalations have been approved/rejected High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Won't Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will not be fixed
#106 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin3
23
dimulski - FlashSwapRouter::emptyReserve() and FlashSwapROuter::emptyReservePartial() functions return incorrect values Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#68 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin2
2
Abhan1041 - Lack of slippage protection leads to loss of protocol funds Has Duplicates A valid issue with 1+ other issues describing the same vulnerability High A High severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Will Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will be fixed
#66 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin4
3
dimulski - The UUPS proxie standard is implemented incorrectly, making the protocol not upgradeable Escalation Resolved This issue's escalations have been approved/rejected Medium A Medium severity issue. Reward A payout will be made for this issue Sponsor Confirmed The sponsor acknowledged this issue is valid Won't Fix The sponsor confirmed this issue will not be fixed
#47 opened Sep 10, 2024 by sherlock-admin2
9
ProTip! Mix and match filters to narrow down what you’re looking for.