forked from ethereum/go-ethereum
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(trace): allow override fork #836
Open
lispc
wants to merge
18
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
trace/override
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b423f02
xx
lispc 1575211
apply curie
lispc 52f3de7
fix
lispc 77c4c34
improve logs
0xmountaintop 4a4eef7
add comments
0xmountaintop b57034d
fix #683
0xmountaintop 3d76358
chore: auto version bump [bot]
55202d8
go mod tidy
0xmountaintop 6bf158a
Merge branch 'trace/override' of github.com:scroll-tech/go-ethereum i…
0xmountaintop 2a88fa7
fix issue caused by unmatching storage value
noel2004 31aa21f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/fix/logger_storage_unmatch' into…
lispc cced17b
fix
lispc 5dd7152
clean code
lispc aea06ec
revert deletion proof fix
lispc dda0030
address comments
lispc e01ba50
Merge branch 'develop' into trace/override
lispc 243f7e7
chore: auto version bump [bot]
lispc ecb1720
Merge branch 'develop' into trace/override
0xmountaintop File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if Curie fork is already enabled, this will overwrite
L1GasPriceOracle
's storage.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if block.Number().Cmp(api.backend.ChainConfig().CurieBlock) < 0 && block.Number().Cmp(curie) > 0 {
. sounds more reasonable?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that is better. But I am afraid not complete. Maybe something like below?
!api.backend.ChainConfig().IsCurie(block.Number()) && block.Number().Cmp(curie) >= 0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in fact if block.Number().Cmp(curie) == 0, i think we don't need to inject system upgrades twice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as long as
!api.backend.ChainConfig().IsCurie(block.Number())
is true, I don't think we would be applying the upgrade twice. If we apply only whenblock.Number().Cmp(curie) > 0
, ApplyCurieHardFork will be applied one block late if I am not mistkaen.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"ApplyCurieHardFork will be applied one block late": you mean the bytecode force upgrade does not happen exactly at the fork height? i don't think so..