-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow anyone to call withdraw function #43
Conversation
Welcome to Codecov 🎉Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests. Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️ |
9f8f40a
to
1391fe9
Compare
51892e3
to
40cca4a
Compare
40cca4a
to
ec4d89c
Compare
refactor: improve custom error names docs: udpate natspec in withdraw function chore: improve wording in explanatory comments test: update withdraw tree and tests accordingly
ec4d89c
to
f470114
Compare
test: don't change the timestampt in deposit invariant handler
f470114
to
c79b497
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have partially reviewed the PR. Please see comments below:
During the review, I also made changes locally which I have pushed to this PR. If you agree with suggestions, we can incorporate those changes from that PR.
… fix comment (#48) * build: add script for deterministic deployment build: enable ffi cheatcode * build: replace ffi with stdJson * doc: fix comment * build: update bun lockfile * chore: capitalize StdJson file import --------- Co-authored-by: andreivladbrg <[email protected]>
Merged your PR here @smol-ninja, if everything looks good now, can we merge this to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good to merge.
Closes #30