Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Take measurement inaccuracy intervals into account #4078

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

Take measurement inaccuracy intervals into account #4078

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions src/ch13-04-performance.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ test bench_search_for ... bench: 19,620,300 ns/iter (+/- 915,700)
test bench_search_iter ... bench: 19,234,900 ns/iter (+/- 657,200)
```

The iterator version was slightly faster! We won’t explain the benchmark code
here, because the point is not to prove that the two versions are equivalent
but to get a general sense of how these two implementations compare
performance-wise.
The two implementations have similar performance! We won’t explain the
benchmark code here, because the point is not to prove that the two versions
are equivalent but to get a general sense of how these two implementations
compare performance-wise.

For a more comprehensive benchmark, you should check using various texts of
various sizes as the `contents`, different words and words of different lengths
Expand Down
Loading