US-2101 Refactor RNS registration screens for better readability and remove circular dependencies

[TravellerOnTheRun]

@jormelCoin the job for you is to test that the domain registration works as it was.

[jormelCoin]

@TravellerOnTheRun, I was able to create a new RNS and also to put my old RNS.

Nonetheless, The fee transaction is wrong because is showing up as 0 TRBTC and it should be one in TRBTC and the other one in RIF like it's in production:

Tested relay true

[TravellerOnTheRun]

@TravellerOnTheRun, I was able to create a new RNS and also to put my old RNS.

Nonetheless, The fee transaction is wrong because is showing up as 0 TRBTC and it should be one in TRBTC and the other one in RIF like it's in production:

Tested relay true

Did you compare it to recent develop?
What is shown in the explorer?

[jormelCoin]

@TravellerOnTheRun, I was able to create a new RNS and also to put my old RNS.
Nonetheless, The fee transaction is wrong because is showing up as 0 TRBTC and it should be one in TRBTC and the other one in RIF like it's in production:
Tested relay true

Did you compare it to recent develop? What is shown in the explorer?

Yep, you're right, it shows up the RBTC. Nevertheless, in the development branch, the amount of the transaction that is deducted appears in RIF even though TRBTC appears in the browser, I assume it is because we show the fee charged in rif.

If you notice on the confirmation screen, you are not charging the 4 RIF that are charged, and they should be charged because this is the relay version, and those 4 RIF are what we should show in the transaction summary.

Evidence of this PR:

20240208_102944.mp4

Evidence of the latest build

RPReplay_Final1707401860.MP4

cc: @jessgusclark

[TravellerOnTheRun]

@TravellerOnTheRun, I was able to create a new RNS and also to put my old RNS.
Nonetheless, The fee transaction is wrong because is showing up as 0 TRBTC and it should be one in TRBTC and the other one in RIF like it's in production:
Tested relay true

Did you compare it to recent develop? What is shown in the explorer?

Yep, you're right, it shows up the RBTC. Nevertheless, in the development branch, the amount of the transaction that is deducted appears in RIF even though TRBTC appears in the browser, I assume it is because we show the fee charged in rif.

If you notice on the confirmation screen, you are not charging the 4 RIF that are charged, and they should be charged because this is the relay version, and those 4 RIF are what we should show in the transaction summary.

Evidence of this PR:

20240208_102944.mp4
Evidence of the latest build

RPReplay_Final1707401860.MP4
cc: @jessgusclark

The thing is that these issues are related to the fact how activityDeserializer works with values, since we don't have etx?.symbol it assumes RBTC, I believe there should be different ticket for that. Let's merge this one, since we have RNS working, and I'll create separate ticket for refactoring activityDeserializer, @jessgusclark what do you think?

@jormelCoin
Please, retest since I've added the actual calculation of the fee, play around with changing values.

[TravellerOnTheRun]

@TravellerOnTheRun, I was able to create a new RNS and also to put my old RNS.
Nonetheless, The fee transaction is wrong because is showing up as 0 TRBTC and it should be one in TRBTC and the other one in RIF like it's in production:
Tested relay true

Did you compare it to recent develop? What is shown in the explorer?

Yep, you're right, it shows up the RBTC. Nevertheless, in the development branch, the amount of the transaction that is deducted appears in RIF even though TRBTC appears in the browser, I assume it is because we show the fee charged in rif.
If you notice on the confirmation screen, you are not charging the 4 RIF that are charged, and they should be charged because this is the relay version, and those 4 RIF are what we should show in the transaction summary.
Evidence of this PR:
20240208_102944.mp4
Evidence of the latest build
RPReplay_Final1707401860.MP4
cc: @jessgusclark

The thing is that these issues are related to the fact how activityDeserializer works with values, since we don't have etx?.symbol it assumes RBTC, I believe there should be different ticket for that. Let's merge this one, since we have RNS working, and I'll create separate ticket for refactoring activityDeserializer, @jessgusclark what do you think?

@jormelCoin Please, retest since I've added the actual calculation of the fee, play around with changing values.

@jormelCoin @jessgusclark
Forget what I was saying, I found the way of doing it without much refactoring, but the activityDeserializer is confusing as hell :(

[jormelCoin]

Functional tests pass