Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase the numerical tolerance for test_pairwise_distances tests. #5562

Conversation

csadorf
Copy link
Contributor

@csadorf csadorf commented Aug 25, 2023

Increase the tolerance for the test_pairwise_distances tests. Previous tolerance was set too low resulting in spurious test failures. Addresses current test failures observed in CI.

@csadorf csadorf added tests Unit testing for project improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Aug 25, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Cython / Python Cython or Python issue label Aug 25, 2023
Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2023
Pin the container-image for the CI clang-tidy check to a previous version as the latest change to move `rapidsai/ci:latest` to CUDA 12 seemingly broke the test. See this [log](https://github.com/rapidsai/cuml/actions/runs/5955794611/job/16155266993#step:9:1) for an example.

Also includes:
- #5562 
- #5572
- #5575

Authors:
  - Simon Adorf (https://github.com/csadorf)
  - Divye Gala (https://github.com/divyegala)
  - Robert Maynard (https://github.com/robertmaynard)
  - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice)

Approvers:
  - William Hicks (https://github.com/wphicks)
  - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd)
  - AJ Schmidt (https://github.com/ajschmidt8)
  - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice)

URL: #5561
@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Sep 13, 2023

Closing now that #5561 has been merged, feel free to reopen if we still need it

@dantegd dantegd closed this Sep 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Cython / Python Cython or Python issue improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change tests Unit testing for project
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants