-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 908
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Preserve name of the column while initializing a DataFrame
#14110
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
833bfda
Fix name of the column object
galipremsagar bf33ebb
add tests
galipremsagar eb53a5a
fix pytest
galipremsagar 0b7d78b
cleanup
galipremsagar 6ba4b24
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/branch-23.10' into 14088
galipremsagar ffce0f6
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/branch-23.10' into 14088
galipremsagar b4d963e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/branch-23.10' into 14088
galipremsagar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need some kind of helper to normalize this? I see this repeated a lot of times.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While the helper does reduce the amount of code somewhat, I think it reduces the overall comprehensibility sadly :( I also find it a bit out-of-place for this helper to live in
column_accessor.py
.I think either we should:
@bdice would you concur?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was on the fence about whether a helper was appropriate here. I feel pretty neutral about the implementation in 88ccc48 -- I would accept the PR with or without the helper, since the DRY benefit and benefit of explicit logic are about even to me. @shwina If you think we should revert that change, I'm fine with that. I don't have any clear improvements to propose for names or APIs of the helper.