Option 1: Use alternate way to incorporate CDTS

[mohsin-r]

Closes #469

Changes

• Updated CDTS to version 5.0.2.
• Used alternate way to incorporate CDTS to remove the soyutils.js file.
• Removed the static CDTS files as they didn't appear to be doing anything.

Testing

1. Go to https://ramp4-pcar4.github.io/story-ramp/cdts/index-ca-en.html#/en/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 and https://ramp4-pcar4.github.io/story-ramp/cdts/index-ca-fr.html#/fr/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
2. Ensure that everything (including the WET template stuff) is respectful.

---

This change is 

[github-actions]

Your demo site is ready! 🚀 Visit it here: https://ramp4-pcar4.github.io/story-ramp/cdts/#/en/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000

[spencerwahl]

looks like a possible css clash? second slide on https://ramp4-pcar4.github.io/story-ramp/cdts/index-ca-en.html#/en/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000

Nevermind, this is the same on main

[spencerwahl]

Reviewed 7 of 7 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @mohsin-r)

[szczz]

Tested both options side by side and noticed no differences.

I'm good with either option.

Reviewed 7 of 7 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @mohsin-r)

[RyanCoulsonCA]

Reviewed 7 of 7 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @mohsin-r)

[mohsin-r]

Rebased.

[szczz]

Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @mohsin-r)