Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat/add --headless to --help #636

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SafetyQuincyF
Copy link
Collaborator

@SafetyQuincyF SafetyQuincyF commented Nov 14, 2024

Description

Adding --headless info to safety --help.
image
Added --headless into to safety auth login --help
image

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor
  • Other (please describe):

Testing

  • Tests added or updated
  • No tests required

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new debugging configuration for the safety module, allowing users to access help documentation directly from the integrated terminal.
    • Added a headless option to the login command, enabling users to run the command in headless mode.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced help text for command-line interface (CLI) commands, providing clearer instructions and improved readability.
    • Updated the CLI_AUTH_COMMAND_HELP to include details on headless authentication and formatted for better clarity.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new debugging configuration for the Safety module in the .vscode/launch.json file, allowing users to launch the module with the --help argument. Additionally, it enhances the help text in safety/scan/constants.py for various command-line interface commands, improving clarity and readability, particularly for headless authentication instructions. The safety/auth/cli.py file has been updated to include a new headless option in the login command, modifying its functionality and user interaction.

Changes

File Change Summary
.vscode/launch.json Added new debugging configuration: Safety --help with properties for launching the safety module.
safety/scan/constants.py Updated CLI_AUTH_COMMAND_HELP for clarity; added CLI_AUTH_HEADLESS_HELP for headless authentication guidance.
safety/auth/cli.py Updated login command to include a new headless option; modified function signature and logic accordingly.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix:jupyter notebook rich format removal #628: The addition of the "Safety Auth Login --headless" configuration in .vscode/launch.json is related to the main PR's new configuration for the safety module, as both involve debugging configurations for the safety module and utilize the --headless argument.

Suggested reviewers

  • dylanpulver

🐰 In the code, I hop and play,
New help commands brighten the way.
With debug tools, I leap with glee,
Safety's secrets now clear to see!
So join me, friends, in this code ballet,
Together we'll code, come what may! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@SafetyQuincyF has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9938769 and 55d8c48.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.vscode/launch.json (1)

133-142: Consider adding a dedicated help configuration for auth commands.

Since the PR focuses on adding --headless to the help documentation for authentication, consider adding a specific configuration for safety auth --help to make it easier to verify the auth-specific help text.

 {
     "name": "Safety --help",
     "type": "debugpy",
     "request": "launch",
     "module": "safety",
     "args": [
         "--help"
     ],
     "console": "integratedTerminal"
 },
+{
+    "name": "Safety Auth --help",
+    "type": "debugpy",
+    "request": "launch",
+    "module": "safety",
+    "args": [
+        "auth",
+        "--help"
+    ],
+    "console": "integratedTerminal"
+},
safety/scan/constants.py (1)

Line range hint 134-135: Update CLI_AUTH_LOGIN_HELP to include headless mode information.

For consistency, the CLI_AUTH_LOGIN_HELP constant should also mention the headless authentication option since it describes the same functionality as CLI_AUTH_COMMAND_HELP.

Apply this diff:

-CLI_AUTH_LOGIN_HELP = "Authenticate with Safety CLI to perform scans. Your default browser will automatically open to https://platform.safetycli.com unless already authenticated.\n\n" \
-    "[bold]Example: safety auth login[/bold]"
+CLI_AUTH_LOGIN_HELP = "Authenticate with Safety CLI to perform scans. Your default browser will automatically open to https://platform.safetycli.com unless already authenticated.\n\n" \
+    "For headless environments, use the --headless option to receive a URL for external browser access.\n\n" \
+    "[bold]Examples:\n" \
+    "  safety auth login\n" \
+    "  safety auth login --headless[/bold]"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 365ba04 and 9938769.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .vscode/launch.json (1 hunks)
  • safety/scan/constants.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
.vscode/launch.json (1)
Learnt from: SafetyQuincyF
PR: pyupio/safety#629
File: .vscode/launch.json:4-13
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T11:52:37.628Z
Learning: The debug configuration for the `--headless` feature is added in a separate PR.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.vscode/launch.json (2)

133-142: LGTM! Configuration structure follows the established pattern.

The new debug configuration for Safety --help is well-structured and consistent with other configurations in the file.


133-142: Verify if --help shows the --headless option.

Let's verify that this configuration will actually display the --headless option in the help text.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:

The --headless option is properly documented in the help text

The help text for the auth command explicitly includes the --headless option, as shown in safety/scan/constants.py:

  • Contains example: safety auth login --headless
  • Includes explanation: "For headless authentication, you will receive a URL to paste into an external browser"
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the help text includes the --headless option
# Expected: The help text should mention the --headless option for authentication

# Search for --headless in Python files to verify it's properly documented
rg -l --type py "[-]{2}headless"

# Search for help text definitions that might need to include --headless
ast-grep --pattern 'CLI_AUTH_COMMAND_HELP = $_'

Length of output: 656


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual help text implementation for the safety command
# to verify if --headless is properly exposed in the help output

# First, let's find where the CLI arguments are defined
ast-grep --pattern 'add_argument("--headless"'

# Also check for any argparse setup that might include the headless option
rg -A 3 'ArgumentParser\(' --type py

Length of output: 87


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the CLI argument definitions
# and help text implementation

# Search for files that might contain the CLI implementation
rg -l "ArgumentParser|add_argument|add_subparsers" --type py

# Look for any auth-related command definitions
rg -A 5 "auth.*login" --type py

Length of output: 4636

safety/scan/constants.py (1)

19-25: LGTM! The headless authentication help text is well-implemented.

The changes effectively document the --headless option in the authentication help text, with clear examples and explanations.

Let's verify consistency with other auth-related help text:

✅ Verification successful

The headless authentication help text is consistently documented across the codebase

The verification confirms that:

  • The --headless flag is properly implemented in the codebase with consistent behavior in safety/auth/cli.py, safety/auth/main.py, and safety/auth/server.py
  • The help text in CLI_AUTH_COMMAND_HELP aligns with the actual implementation
  • The feature is properly tracked in the changelog (CHANGELOG.md)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the headless option is consistently documented across auth-related help text
# Expected: No inconsistencies in the documentation of the headless option

# Search for all auth-related help text
rg "auth.*help" -A 5 -B 5

# Search for any mentions of headless authentication
rg -i "headless"

Length of output: 4593

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
safety/auth/cli.py (1)

137-137: Consider using a more explicit boolean conversion.

While headless is True works, consider using a more standard boolean conversion for better readability:

-    headless = headless is True 
+    headless = bool(headless)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9938769 and 55d8c48.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .vscode/launch.json (1 hunks)
  • safety/auth/cli.py (2 hunks)
  • safety/scan/constants.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .vscode/launch.json
  • safety/scan/constants.py
🔇 Additional comments (4)
safety/auth/cli.py (4)

26-26: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.

The addition of CLI_AUTH_HEADLESS_HELP constant import aligns with the PR objective of adding headless mode documentation.


127-136: LGTM: Function signature is well-structured.

The headless parameter is properly implemented with:

  • Correct type annotation using Optional[bool]
  • Clear option definition with help text
  • Appropriate default value

Line range hint 137-193: LGTM: Headless mode implementation is complete and consistent.

The implementation:

  • Properly handles different user messages for headless mode
  • Correctly propagates the headless parameter through the authentication flow
  • Maintains consistent behavior with the existing functionality

127-136: Verify help text display.

The implementation exceeds the PR objective by adding full headless functionality. Let's verify that the help text is properly displayed:

✅ Verification successful

Help text for headless mode is properly implemented

The help text for the --headless option is correctly implemented:

  • The constant CLI_AUTH_HEADLESS_HELP is defined in safety/scan/constants.py with the text: "For headless authentication, you will receive a URL to paste into an external browser."
  • The help text is properly imported and used in safety/auth/cli.py for the --headless option
  • The implementation provides clear guidance to users about the headless authentication process
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that --headless appears in help text

# Test: Check if --headless appears in help output
python -c "from safety.scan.constants import CLI_AUTH_HEADLESS_HELP; print(CLI_AUTH_HEADLESS_HELP)"

# Test: Check if --headless appears in CLI help
safety auth login --help 2>/dev/null || true

Length of output: 209


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find and read the constants file directly
rg -l "CLI_AUTH_HEADLESS_HELP" 

# Also search for any help text related to headless mode
rg -i "headless.*help|help.*headless"

# Find the constants file location
fd "constants.py"

Length of output: 581

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants