Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates to Opacus to handle extra args returned in ghost clipping, dynamically provide epsilon_tolerance. #695

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pagarwl
Copy link

@pagarwl pagarwl commented Dec 9, 2024

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Docs change / refactoring / dependency upgrade

Motivation and Context / Related issue

a) Currently make_private returns criterion if the ghost clipping algorithm was chosen, otherwise it doesn't. The return args list Tuple[GradSampleModule, DPOptimizer, DataLoader] is incorrect in this case. This causes compile time error when using ghost clipping technique. Removing the return arg specification (similar to make_private_with_epsilon), as a quick fix to avoid compile errors, while the approach can be further updated.

b) Allow providing epsilon_tolerance dynamically.

How Has This Been Tested (if it applies)

Compile, unit tests, and manual runs.

Checklist

  • The documentation is up-to-date with the changes I made.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document and completed the CLA (see CONTRIBUTING).
  • All tests passed, and additional code has been covered with new tests.

…rithm is described in the 'A Unified Fast Gradient Clipping Framework for DP-SGD' paper: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/file/a45d344b28179c8da7646bc38ff50ad8-Paper-Conference.pdf. This reduces the memory needed to run DP-SGD over embedding layers, significantly reducing OOMs over large embedding layers.
… returned for ghost vs non-ghost clipping techniques. The approach can be further enhanced, adding a quick fix to handle the error. b) Allow providing epsilon_tolerance dynamically.
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @pagarwl!

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community.

Action Required

In order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Dec 11, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks!

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants