gh-126180: Remove getopt and optparse deprecation notices #126227

ncoghlan · 2024-10-31T05:35:32Z

getopt and optparse are in no way at risk of being removed,
as they have genuinely valid use cases. Those use cases
(mimicing the C getopt API, implementing third party
command line argument processing libraries) are just
far less common than the ones that argparse addresses.

Relevant issue is #126180.

Issue: Undeprecate getopt and optparse #126180

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--126227.org.readthedocs.build/

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>

ncoghlan · 2024-10-31T08:11:29Z

Doc/library/optparse.rst

-more declarative style of command-line parsing: you create an instance of
-:class:`OptionParser`, populate it with options, and parse the command
-line. :mod:`optparse` allows users to specify options in the conventional
+command-line options than the minimalist :mod:`getopt` module.


Replacing old with minimalist is the only actual wording change here (the rest is just reflowing text)

serhiy-storchaka

You are focused on one particular peculiarity in argparse, but there are many others. The difference is fundamental in the way how optional and positional arguments are parsed.

serhiy-storchaka · 2024-10-31T08:53:56Z

Doc/howto/argparse.rst

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ recommended command-line parsing module in the Python standard library.

   There are two other modules that fulfill the same task, namely
   :mod:`getopt` (an equivalent for ``getopt()`` from the C
-   language) and the deprecated :mod:`optparse`.
+   language) and the lower level :mod:`optparse` module.


This may create an impression that optparse is lower level than getopt.

I'll reorder it to make it clear the "lower level" comparison is relative to argparse

serhiy-storchaka · 2024-10-31T08:57:44Z

Doc/library/argparse.rst

+   conventions around the handling of option parameter values that start
+   with ``-`` is desired.


Not only this. There are other peculiarities that make implementation of compatible interface with argparse impossible (unlike to getopt and optparse).

OK, I had gotten the impression from the Discourse thread that this was the primary quirk, but I can reword these caveats to be less specific to that one issue.

serhiy-storchaka · 2024-10-31T09:00:55Z

Doc/library/argparse.rst

@@ -11,6 +11,18 @@

 **Source code:** :source:`Lib/argparse.py`

+.. note::
+
+   While :mod:`argparse` is the recommended standard library module for


I would not recommend it for now. You can use it on your own risk. optparse may need more work, but it works as expected. I would recommend it for beginners, which cannot distinguish their own errors from peculiarities of the library.

For this PR, I'd like to stick with the status quo as far as recommendations go (that is, only taking the step back from "argparse is the only non-deprecated argument processing option in the standard library").

Taking the extra step to saying "argparse is not recommended over optparse anymore, even for end user applications" would then be a separate follow up question.

serhiy-storchaka · 2024-10-31T09:03:08Z

Doc/library/cmdlinelibs.rst

+   argparse.rst
+   optparse.rst


I would place optparse above argparse.

serhiy-storchaka · 2024-10-31T09:04:23Z

Doc/library/getopt.rst

-   The :mod:`getopt` module is :term:`soft deprecated` and will not be
-   developed further; development will continue with the :mod:`argparse`
-   module.
-
 .. note::


I would convert the note in normal paragraph. Also, it should refer to optparse as an object-oriented and extensible alternative, not only to argparse (which is not an equivalent).

I ended up moving this page back to the "Superseded" section of the docs, as it really is a niche use case when anyone should be reaching for this. The use of the note syntax here reflects that "You almost certainly don't want this module" status.

I agree about referring readers to optparse in the note, though.

serhiy-storchaka · 2024-10-31T09:07:52Z

Doc/library/getopt.rst

+       opts, args = parser.parse_args()
+       process(args, output=opts.output, verbose=opts.verbose)
+
+An equivalent command line interface for this simple case can also be produced


Even in this simple example this is not an exact equivalent. For example, -o -v and -o -- do not work, -o=foo works differently, you cannot interleave options and positional arguments. I said this is "a roughly equivalent".

I think if we elaborate on the discrepancies here, it may help lay the foundation for weakening the current recommendation to use argparse in a future PR. I'll incorporate more of your notes here tomorrow.

serhiy-storchaka · 2024-10-31T09:09:46Z

Doc/library/getopt.rst

       # ... do something with args.output ...
       # ... do something with args.verbose ..


I added this to show the difference in the API between three modules

parser.add_argument('rest', nargs='*') args = parser.parse_args() process(args.rest, output=args.output, verbose=args.verbose)

serhiy-storchaka · 2024-10-31T09:15:57Z

Doc/library/getopt.rst

+``optparse`` versions due to the way ``argparse`` handles parameter
+values that start with ``-``.


The difference is not only in this.

ncoghlan · 2024-10-31T10:09:02Z

@serhiy-storchaka I think several of your suggestions are good improvements. I should have time to incorporate them tomorrow (Nov 1 AEST)

Remove getopt and optparse deprecation notices

a560986

bedevere-app bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting core review labels Oct 31, 2024

bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2024

Revisit getopt and optparse soft deprecations #126225

Closed

Wording tweaks

0a568f1

ncoghlan changed the title ~~gh-126225: Remove getopt and optparse deprecation notices~~ gh-126180: Remove getopt and optparse deprecation notices Oct 31, 2024

bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2024

Undeprecate getopt and optparse #126180

Open

ncoghlan added the DO-NOT-MERGE label Oct 31, 2024

ncoghlan mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2024

gh-126180: Undeprecate getopt and optparse #126186

Open

ncoghlan and others added 9 commits October 31, 2024 16:14

Incorporate improvements from Serhiy's PR

55b7215

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>

Grammar fix

0971780

Fix issue number reference

09b0237

Another wording tweak

4cdebde

Update heading and description for new chapter

693a979

fileinput belongs in the new chapter

50d1ee4

Move getopt back to the superseded section

4e50c74

Reword superseded chapter intro

0db2c88

Simplify wording

e474e77

ncoghlan commented Oct 31, 2024

View reviewed changes

serhiy-storchaka self-requested a review October 31, 2024 08:50

serhiy-storchaka reviewed Oct 31, 2024

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

gh-126180: Remove getopt and optparse deprecation notices #126227

gh-126180: Remove getopt and optparse deprecation notices #126227

ncoghlan commented Oct 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ncoghlan Oct 31, 2024

serhiy-storchaka left a comment

serhiy-storchaka Oct 31, 2024

ncoghlan Oct 31, 2024

serhiy-storchaka Oct 31, 2024

ncoghlan Oct 31, 2024

serhiy-storchaka Oct 31, 2024

ncoghlan Oct 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

serhiy-storchaka Oct 31, 2024

serhiy-storchaka Oct 31, 2024

ncoghlan Oct 31, 2024

serhiy-storchaka Oct 31, 2024

ncoghlan Oct 31, 2024

serhiy-storchaka Oct 31, 2024

serhiy-storchaka Oct 31, 2024

ncoghlan commented Oct 31, 2024

		conventions around the handling of option parameter values that start
		with ``-`` is desired.

		# ... do something with args.output ...
		# ... do something with args.verbose ..

		``optparse`` versions due to the way ``argparse`` handles parameter
		values that start with ``-``.

gh-126180: Remove getopt and optparse deprecation notices #126227

Are you sure you want to change the base?

gh-126180: Remove getopt and optparse deprecation notices #126227

Conversation

ncoghlan commented Oct 31, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

ncoghlan Oct 31, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

ncoghlan commented Oct 31, 2024

ncoghlan commented Oct 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ncoghlan Oct 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading