Added option for different arg/return type hints to type_caster #5358
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR adds the option for defining
return_name
in a customtype_caster
, which allows to have different python type hints for arguments and return value. The check ifreturn_name
is available orname
should be used as fallback is implemented using the template classas_return_type
.This is entirely optional and should not impact any existing
type_caster
.One exception is the
type_caster
forstd::filesystem::path
, which was modified to support this new feature.Here,
Union[os.PathLike, str, bytes]
is the argument type hint andPath
is the return type hint.This is more accurate than the previous usage of
os.PathLike
for both argument and return type hint.I have updated the unit test to check for the new signature.
Suggested changelog entry:
Possible TODOs
Custom type casters
documentationlist[Path]
-> does not workhandle_type_name
(maybe some recursive template magic addingas_return_type
to subtypes)np.ndarray
as arg type hint but also takes lists and tuples (should probably benumpy.typing.ArrayLike
+ maybetyping.Annotated
for shape/dtype annotationI would love to get feedback on this!
Especially on the "Possible TODO" regarding Eigen. Should I implement that here in this PR or should I open a separate PR later?
Currently I am working on adding typing stubs to Open3D (isl-org/Open3D#6917) using
pybind11-stubgen
.Applying mypy/pyright on existing example code showed that a lot of type checks failed, which could be fixed by this PR.