Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use joda-time 2.8.1 #6

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 15, 2015
Merged

Conversation

omarkj
Copy link

@omarkj omarkj commented Oct 14, 2015

This updates joda-time to version 2.8.1. This is due to a bug in older versions of
joda-time which cause it to break when used with the AWS SDK.

This bumps the version to 0.2.6-SNAPSHOT. I'm unsure on the version strategy, just let me know
if this is not the version number you'd like.

This updates joda-time to version 2.8.1. This is due to a bug in older versions of
joda-time which cause it to [break when used with the AWS SDK](aws/aws-sdk-java#484).
@rbxbx
Copy link

rbxbx commented Oct 14, 2015

@pjstadig can confirm this works and doesn't do all the prefix malarky that's in this branch https://github.com/pjstadig/lein-maven-s3-wagon/pull/5/files

@pjstadig
Copy link
Owner

@omarkj thanks! In regards to the version number, we should keep it at 0.2.5-SNAPSHOT, and when I do a release it will get bumped. I think I'm fine with this being a bugfix release, since I assume that it fixes the issue, and nothing else breaks.

@pjstadig asked for the version number to be
changed back to 0.2.5-SNAPSHOT.
@omarkj
Copy link
Author

omarkj commented Oct 14, 2015

@pjstadig Yes, this fixes the issue but I am not aware of anything breaking in joda-time 2.8.1. I did skim over the changes.

I've changed the version number as requested.

pjstadig added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2015
@pjstadig pjstadig merged commit f86f842 into pjstadig:master Oct 15, 2015
@omarkj omarkj deleted the omarkj-update-joda-to-2-8-1 branch October 15, 2015 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants