Club approval response templates

[rm03]

This PR introduces a new feature that enables site administrators to efficiently manage templated responses for the club approval/rejection process. Admins can now create, update, and select predefined templates when approving or rejecting clubs (works for individual or bulk approvals/rejections). This feature replaces the manual task of copying and pasting responses, reducing overhead and ensuring consistent messaging

Template management tab on admin dashboard:

Template dropdown on club page:

Template dropdown on queue page for bulk approvals/rejections:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.77419% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.80%. Comparing base (ca77e21) to head (3f606f3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
backend/clubs/models.py	87.50%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #739      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.68%   71.80%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        6870     6901      +31     
==========================================
+ Hits         4925     4955      +30     
- Misses       1945     1946       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[aviupadhyayula]

This is sick, great work Rohan. Backend code LGTM. About the frontend: do we plan to support someone applying multiple templates to the same approval decision? I can envision a club getting rejected for multiple reasons (e.g. a club's name has Penn in it, and it doesn't have enough members).

[rm03]

This is sick, great work Rohan. Backend code LGTM. About the frontend: do we plan to support someone applying multiple templates to the same approval decision? I can envision a club getting rejected for multiple reasons (e.g. a club's name has Penn in it, and it doesn't have enough members).

Just added this, if one of you can test locally and let me know if it works that would be great 🙂

[julianweng]

Tested locally, some code duplication is acceptable given the scale so LGTM!