Creates partiql-tpc tool to generate TPC-DS in Ion, CSV, and Parquet

[RCHowell]

Description

This leverages Trino's Java port of TPC-DS to generate TPC benchmarking data. This PR includes a CSV and Ion Text writer.

Usage: partiql-tpc [-hV] -d=<benchmark> --format=<format> --output=<output>
                   [--part=<part>] [--partitions=<partitions>]
                   [--scale=<scale>] [--table=<table>]
Writes a TPC dataset
  -d, -dataset=<benchmark>   Dataset type; valid values: TPCDS, TPCH
      --format=<format>      Output format; valid values: ION, CSV, PARQUET
  -h, --help                 Show this help message and exit.
      --output=<output>
      --part=<part>
      --partitions=<partitions>

      --scale=<scale>        Scale factor is 1GB
      --table=<table>        Table to generate; if not specified, all tables
                               are generated. https://www.tpc.
                               org/tpc_documents_current_versions/pdf/tpc-ds_v2.
                               6.0.pdf
  -V, --version              Print version information and exit.

Additionally, I've added a Parquet writer which I've done preliminary verification using https://crates.io/crates/pqrs

Once merged, will need to open issues where the partitioning and file naming isn't quite right

Relevant Issues

Performance related issues would benefit from this work as we can use it to collect metrics.

• Ion files cannot be referenced twice #936
• Optimizer to improve evaluation performance #1108
• Expecting higher performance from select count(*)  #147
• Avoid Full Data Materialization #185

Other Information

• Updated Unreleased Section in CHANGELOG: [YES/NO]
  No

• Any backward-incompatible changes? [YES/NO]
  No

• Any new external dependencies? [YES/NO]

  • io.trino.tpcds:tpcds (Apache-2.0)
  • org.apache.parquet:parquet (Apache-2.0)

• Do your changes comply with the Contributing Guidelines
  and Code Style Guidelines? [YES/NO]
  Yes

License Information

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[github-actions]

Conformance comparison report

	Base (c580925)	e82dd65	+/-
% Passing	92.40%	92.40%	0.00%
✅ Passing	5376	5376	0
❌ Failing	442	442	0
🔶 Ignored	0	0	0
Total Tests	5818	5818	0

Number passing in both: 5376

Number failing in both: 442

Number passing in Base (c580925) but now fail: 0

Number failing in Base (c580925) but now pass: 0

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (c580925) 73.18% compared to head (9844380) 73.18%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #1170   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     73.18%   73.18%           
  Complexity     2358     2358           
=========================================
  Files           224      224           
  Lines         17398    17398           
  Branches       3202     3202           
=========================================
  Hits          12733    12733           
  Misses         3680     3680           
  Partials        985      985           

Flag	Coverage Δ
CLI	14.28% <ø> (ø)
EXAMPLES	80.28% <ø> (ø)
LANG	79.03% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.