Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add summary for scraped sources from specfiles #216

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

mfocko
Copy link
Member

@mfocko mfocko commented Aug 15, 2024

@mfocko mfocko self-assigned this Aug 15, 2024
Copy link
Member

@lbarcziova lbarcziova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice work, thanks!

research/specfiles/hosting-sources/process.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
This “research” provides the scripts that have been used to process the scraped
sources.

### Domains with ≥ 10 occurrences
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so, what do you think will be the reasonable threshold for us to ask for the firewall adjustments?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some of the bigger domains, it appears that with dependencies it's easy to get ≥ 10. Additionally we don't have many blocked packages on the firewall, so I would consider only the really big hosts (like forges).

All `SourceX` fields of the specfiles have been initially scraped by the @msuchy.
This “research” provides the scripts that have been used to process the scraped
sources.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you please include here some instructions on how the data can be obtained (how should be the script run)?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean the script in this repo or the one that scrapes the specfiles?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would it make sense to include both? It would be enough to mention here what files represent what.

Copy link
Member

@lachmanfrantisek lachmanfrantisek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job! The outcome looks really reasonable.

mfocko and others added 3 commits August 27, 2024 15:08
@mfocko mfocko enabled auto-merge August 27, 2024 13:27
@mfocko mfocko added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into packit:main with commit caba156 Aug 27, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Scrape all the specfiles from Fedora for source URLs
3 participants