Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix CI P4Runtime Spec #541

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 1, 2025
Merged

Fix CI P4Runtime Spec #541

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 1, 2025

Conversation

Dscano
Copy link
Contributor

@Dscano Dscano commented Jan 31, 2025

As pointed out by Antonin here , the PR bringing back the build folder, where the .pdf and .htmlspecs will be stored

docs/v1/Makefile Outdated
-rf build
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing /bin/rm in this line?

docs/v1/Makefile Outdated
/bin/rm -rf build resources/figs/*.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we delete the resources/figs/*.png files, may as well also delete the *.svg files in that directory, too, yes?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Dscano @jafingerhut Is this resolved? I would like to merge this so incoming PRs can be synced.

Copy link
Contributor

@jafingerhut jafingerhut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Except for one minor enhancement to the Makefile clean target, looks good to me.

@Dscano
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dscano commented Feb 1, 2025

Except for one minor enhancement to the Makefile clean target, looks good to me.

Done

@jafingerhut
Copy link
Contributor

@chrispsommers Looks reasonable to me now, Chris, in case you want to take a look and try merging it to see if it gets us closer.

@jafingerhut
Copy link
Contributor

@chrispsommers I think as long as a PR is updating the .asciidoc version of the spec, and not the old .mdk Madoko spec, it should be good to merge it as soon as you approve of it. Any remaining changes for generating the HTML and PDF files and publishing can proceed later, independently of any spec changes.

@chrispsommers chrispsommers merged commit 5076463 into p4lang:main Feb 1, 2025
5 checks passed
@jafingerhut
Copy link
Contributor

FYI, I just checked the "working draft" versions of the P4Runtime spec available on this page https://p4.org/specs/ today, and both the PDF and HTML versions are the new ones generated from AsciiDoc sources. Hurrah!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants