Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Monorepo - add protocol rewards #255

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023
Merged

Conversation

oveddan
Copy link
Collaborator

@oveddan oveddan commented Oct 10, 2023

  • Add protocol rewards to the monorepo
  • Fix coverage jobs to allow passing files to ignore as an argument

@oveddan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oveddan commented Oct 10, 2023

Current dependencies on/for this PR:

This comment was auto-generated by Graphite.

@oveddan oveddan force-pushed the monorepo-with-protocol-rewards branch from 01812a2 to 72377c7 Compare October 12, 2023 16:54
@oveddan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oveddan commented Oct 12, 2023

Merge activity

  • Oct 12, 12:55 PM: @oveddan started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.

@oveddan oveddan changed the base branch from monorepo to main October 12, 2023 16:55
@oveddan oveddan force-pushed the monorepo-with-protocol-rewards branch from 72377c7 to ff2672e Compare October 12, 2023 17:54
@oveddan oveddan merged commit 38fc9af into main Oct 12, 2023
4 checks passed
@oveddan oveddan deleted the monorepo-with-protocol-rewards branch October 12, 2023 17:55
iainnash pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
* added protocol-rewards

* ignore other packages in coverage report

* added protocol rewards coverage

* rename coverage tasks

* make project specific files to ignore

* fix escape chars

* try to wrap with single quoates

* added protocol rewards to readme

* fix protocol rewards url
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants