luci-wireless: Add 11be support

[rmandrad]

Tested with banana rpi-4

In order to complete 11be support - the below pulls will need to be applied

RPCD - openwrt/rpcd#5
iwinfo - openwrt/iwinfo#10

Signed-off-by: Rudy Andram [email protected]
Tested-By: Daniel Pawlik [email protected]

Tested on: arm64 / Mediatek / filogic / banana rpi4 ; QNAP Qualcommax IPQ8074

more details on closed PR - #7279

• This PR is not from my main or master branch 💩, but a separate branch ✅
• Each commit has a valid ✒️ Signed-off-by: <[email protected]> row (via git commit --signoff)
• Each commit and PR title has a valid 📝 <package name>: title first line subject for packages
• Incremented 🆙 any PKG_VERSION in the Makefile
• Tested on: (architecture, openwrt version, browser) ✅
• ( Preferred ) Mention: @ the original code author for feedback
• ( Preferred ) Screenshot or mp4 of changes:
• ( Optional ) Closes: e.g. openwrt/luci#issue-number
• ( Optional ) Depends on: e.g. openwrt/packages#pr-number in sister repo
• Description: (describe the changes proposed in this PR)

[rmandrad]

created this new pull instead of working on the previous - hopefully has cleared all of the updates I made tabs/spaces etc

[systemcrash]

Looks better in any case. What was doing the indentation? Some pre-commit hooks?

[systemcrash]

Those other PRs aren't necessary any longer, are they?

[rmandrad]

Those other PRs aren't necessary any longer, are they?

they are now on snapshot ....

[rmandrad]

Looks better in any case. What was doing the indentation? Some pre-commit hooks?

i was doing the changes on a dev branch ... with code-insiders (beta of vscode) and would promote the code to another vm where I was bundling the changes . The problem was that every change after your feedback was somehow adding more stuff on top ... like i would fix one bit and another would get wrong where was right before ... like a big spaghetti! really don't know i put the blame on the dev vm and code insiders with default settings

gave up and started from scratch ...will keep it simple from now on

[N-Storm]

I've tested LuCI 802.11be support patches from @rmandrad for a few days (compiling from his fork) on my BPI-R4 and it works for me.

[bublikOff]

for me it worked like a charm

[Denis2371]

The changes are very simple. As I can see, it's just edits to the LuCI interface. Or I'm tired of setting parameters through the files! You can finally do it through the graphical interface, because this patch works perfectly well!

[systemcrash]

I’m happy if you’re happy, @dannil.

looks ready.

[Denis2371]

Good

[dannil]

I’m happy if you’re happy, @dannil.

looks ready.

I agree, seems ready to merge.

@rmandrad you checked for regressions on a non-WiFi 7-device which I wrote about in the previous PR, that's the QNAP running IPQ8074 right? The most important part is that we avoid regressions, as long as we are just missing some bits and pieces (I can't test this myself unfortunately as I don't have any WiFi 7-gear) that can just be added in future PR:s, the WiFi 7-support is very fresh anyway.

[rmandrad]

I’m happy if you’re happy, @dannil.
looks ready.

I agree, seems ready to merge.

@rmandrad you checked for regressions on a non-WiFi 7-device which I wrote about in the previous PR, that's the QNAP running IPQ8074 right? The most important part is that we avoid regressions, as long as we are just missing some bits and pieces (I can't test this myself unfortunately as I don't have any WiFi 7-gear) that can just be added in future PR:s, the WiFi 7-support is very fresh anyway.

i have tested on a IPQ8074x qualcommax qnap ... only have IPQ874x devices + the banana rpi4

[systemcrash]

@rmandrad BTW don't add merge commits. ( Please remove it ) Just rebase your work on master.

[systemcrash]

OK. I'm satisfied. Want to take a last look, @dannil ?

[rmandrad]

I can create a separate pull that reformats the entire function like this - let me know

`function format_wifirate(rate) {
if (rate) {
s = '%.1f\xa0%s, %d\xa0%s'.format(rate.rate / 1000, _('Mbit/s'), rate.mhz, _('MHz'));
ht = rate.ht || false;
vht = rate.vht || false;
mhz = rate.mhz || 0;
nss = rate.nss || 0;
mcs = rate.mcs || 0;
sgi = rate.short_gi || false;
he = rate.he || false;
he_gi = rate.he_gi || 0;
he_dcm = rate.he_dcm || 0;
eht = rate.eht || false;
eht_gi = rate.eht_gi || 0;
eht_dcm = rate.eht_dcm || 0;
}

if (ht || vht) {
    if (vht) s += ', VHT-MCS\xa0%d'.format(mcs);
    if (nss) s += ', VHT-NSS\xa0%d'.format(nss);
    if (ht) s += ', MCS\xa0%s'.format(mcs);
    if (sgi) s += ', ' + _('Short GI').replace(/ /g, '\xa0');
}

if (he) {
    s += ', HE-MCS\xa0%d'.format(mcs);
    if (nss) s += ', HE-NSS\xa0%d'.format(nss);
    if (he_gi) s += ', HE-GI\xa0%d'.format(he_gi);
    if (he_dcm) s += ', HE-DCM\xa0%d'.format(he_dcm);
}

if (eht) {
    s += ', EHT-MCS\xa0%d'.format(mcs);
    if (nss) s += ', EHT-NSS\xa0%d'.format(nss);
    if (eht_gi) s += ', EHT-GI\xa0%d'.format(eht_gi);
    if (eht_dcm) s += ', EHT-DCM\xa0%d'.format(eht_dcm);
}

return s;

}`

[systemcrash]

Could you remove to stash from the bottom of your commit message please @rmandrad ?

[dannil]

@systemcrash let's merge

[systemcrash]

Thanks @rmandrad and @dannil. Merged to master.

[systemcrash]

@rmandrad - is the 11be stuff only in master, including rpcd and iwinfo?

[rmandrad]

@rmandrad - is the 11be stuff only in master, including rpcd and iwinfo?

yes... of course other folks have their own repos/branches etc