Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default watcher container images to master release #42

Merged

Conversation

amoralej
Copy link
Contributor

Currently watcher-operator defaults to antelope release container images. However, in order to integrate in openatck-k8s-operators environments it requires integration with prometheus which will only be supported in master (epoxy) cycle.

This patch is setting master container images as defaults. Once epoxy is release we can move to them if available.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2658

Currently watcher-operator defaults to antelope release container
images. However, in order to integrate in openatck-k8s-operators
environments it requires integration with prometheus which will only be
supported in master (epoxy) cycle.

This patch is setting master container images as defaults. Once epoxy is
release we can move to them if available.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from abays and olliewalsh January 17, 2025 15:05
@raukadah
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@raukadah
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 20, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: raukadah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 5cf79ef into openstack-k8s-operators:main Jan 20, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants