Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-48044: Install Nutanix multi-NICs cluster failed with failureDomain #9364

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yanhua121
Copy link
Contributor

OCPBUGS-48044: Install Nutanix multi-NICs cluster failed with failureDomain

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yanhua121: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48044, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

OCPBUGS-48044: Install Nutanix multi-NICs cluster failed with failureDomain

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 14, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from andfasano and jhixson74 January 14, 2025 16:01
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 14, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign barbacbd for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 14, 2025

@yanhua121: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc-edge-zones dcb4afd link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc-edge-zones
ci/prow/e2e-azurestack dcb4afd link false /test e2e-azurestack
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node dcb4afd link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
ci/prow/verify-codegen dcb4afd link true /test verify-codegen
ci/prow/e2e-azure-default-config dcb4afd link false /test e2e-azure-default-config
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-resourcegroup dcb4afd link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-resourcegroup
ci/prow/okd-scos-images dcb4afd link true /test okd-scos-images
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-default-config dcb4afd link false /test e2e-gcp-default-config
ci/prow/artifacts-images dcb4afd link true /test artifacts-images
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-heterogeneous dcb4afd link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-heterogeneous
ci/prow/altinfra-images dcb4afd link true /test altinfra-images
ci/prow/altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn dcb4afd link false /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc-custom-security-groups dcb4afd link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc-custom-security-groups
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-secureboot dcb4afd link false /test e2e-gcp-secureboot
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-byo-vpc dcb4afd link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-byo-vpc
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network dcb4afd link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-imdsv2 dcb4afd link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-imdsv2
ci/prow/unit dcb4afd link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-aws-default-config dcb4afd link false /test e2e-aws-default-config
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-static-ovn dcb4afd link false /test e2e-vsphere-static-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn dcb4afd link true /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn dcb4afd link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-nfv-intel dcb4afd link false /test e2e-openstack-nfv-intel
ci/prow/terraform-images dcb4afd link true /test terraform-images
ci/prow/golint dcb4afd link true /test golint
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-proxy dcb4afd link false /test e2e-openstack-proxy
ci/prow/govet dcb4afd link true /test govet
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn dcb4afd link true /test e2e-azure-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips dcb4afd link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
ci/prow/aro-unit dcb4afd link true /test aro-unit
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn dcb4afd link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones dcb4afd link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
ci/prow/images dcb4afd link true /test images
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-shared-vpc dcb4afd link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-shared-vpc
ci/prow/verify-vendor dcb4afd link true /test verify-vendor
ci/prow/gofmt dcb4afd link true /test gofmt
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones-manifest-validation dcb4afd link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones-manifest-validation
ci/prow/openstack-manifests dcb4afd link true /test openstack-manifests
ci/prow/azure-ovn-marketplace-images dcb4afd link false /test azure-ovn-marketplace-images
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-xpn dcb4afd link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-xpn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@yanhua121 yanhua121 marked this pull request as draft January 14, 2025 21:53
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants