-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Increment version to 2.10.0 and refactoring #321
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Bharathwaj G <[email protected]>
bd13476
to
21721ff
Compare
Signed-off-by: Bharathwaj G <[email protected]>
1fbe6d0
to
c12bc0b
Compare
Signed-off-by: Bharathwaj G <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bharathwaj G <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bharathwaj G <[email protected]>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #321 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage ? 84.11%
Complexity ? 559
======================================
Files ? 61
Lines ? 2046
Branches ? 146
======================================
Hits ? 1721
Misses ? 228
Partials ? 97 |
Signed-off-by: Bharathwaj G <[email protected]>
getPluginResource(bwcFilePath + bwcVersion, bwcRemoteFile) | ||
// Creates two test clusters of previous version and loads opensearch plugin of bwcVersion | ||
2.times { i -> | ||
testClusters { | ||
"${baseName}$i" { | ||
testDistribution = "ARCHIVE" | ||
versions = ["1.1.0",opensearch_version] | ||
versions = ["2.9.0",opensearch_version] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Could we use bwcVersionShort
here?
Description
Increment version to 2.10.0
Issues Resolved
#316
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.