Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add BulkShardRequest Serialization Test #17057

Merged

Conversation

jchrys
Copy link
Contributor

@jchrys jchrys commented Jan 20, 2025

Description

Add BulkShardRequest Serialization Test

Related Issues

Resolves #[Issue number to be closed when this PR is merged]

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for 93fdaaa: SUCCESS

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.19%. Comparing base (1b4a817) to head (93fdaaa).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #17057      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.23%   72.19%   -0.04%     
- Complexity    65292    65305      +13     
============================================
  Files          5301     5301              
  Lines        303823   303823              
  Branches      44033    44033              
============================================
- Hits         219454   219335     -119     
- Misses        66344    66508     +164     
+ Partials      18025    17980      -45     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@andrross
Copy link
Member

@jchrys Thanks for the contribution! Just curious, what's the reason for adding this test? I'm all for better tests, just wondering if there was a related bug or problem that motivated this change.

@andrross andrross added skip-changelog backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch labels Jan 22, 2025
@jchrys
Copy link
Contributor Author

jchrys commented Jan 22, 2025

@andrross
Thanks for your reviewing my PR :D
The motivation for this came from a suggestion in an OpenSearch deep dive session. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDc23q47h_w&t=1790s)

@andrross andrross merged commit 7977446 into opensearch-project:main Jan 22, 2025
67 of 68 checks passed
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
Signed-off-by: jchrys <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 7977446)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
andrross pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
(cherry picked from commit 7977446)

Signed-off-by: jchrys <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@jchrys jchrys deleted the add-bulkshardrequest-ser-test branch January 23, 2025 01:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch skip-changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants