Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Star Tree] [Search] Support for metric aggregations with/without term query #15289

Merged
merged 35 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

sandeshkr419
Copy link
Contributor

@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 commented Aug 19, 2024

Disclaimer

These changes are built on top of unmerged/in-review indexing changes, Reviewers kindly ignore this commit while reviewing this change. When the depending changes are merged, will remove the Do not merge from title, and add chngelog to the PR - avoiding adding now to avoid unnecessary rebasing/conflicts.

Description

For an index supporting star-tree composite index, this changes tries to achieve resolving a metric aggregation with/without a numeric terms query with the help of star-tree.

In present state, the PR capture changes for sum, max, min, avg, value-count aggregation. Once the high level changes in sum aggregation are reviewed, will increment with other aggregations.

Approach

A new StarTreeQuery is introduced which helps resolve to star-tree documents. This star-tree query is formed (if it can be) at the shard level, this is not done at coordinator level to avoid node to node transportation. Also, all the information is present at shard level and OpenSearch does majority of query rewrite at shard level itself. This star tree query is encapsulated in an OriginalOrStarTreeQuery which helps preserve the original query alongwith the new star tree query. This encapsulation is done so as to preserve both the queries and decision whether to use which query can be taken at a segment level.

High Level Operations (to make code reviewing simple):

  1. Parsing a Search Query, to decide whether or not to use star tree flow: SearchService.java, QueryShardContext.java
  2. Parsed SearchQuery: StarTreeQuery.java, OriginalOrStarTreeQuery.java
  3. Utilities for resolving star-tree given certain predicates (derived from term query of search request), and tree traversal - StarTreeFilter.java
  4. Changes in 5 metric Aggregators - SumAggregator.java, MaxAggregator.java, MinAggregator.java, AvgAggregator.java, ValueCountAggregator.java
  5. Supporting changes - changes in access level of aggregator factory classes so identify correct aggregations during request parsing.

TODO in this PR:

  1. Test cases to be added.
  2. Support for max, min, count, avg metric aggregations.

This PR depends on #14809, therefore the depending unmerged changes have been utilized for now in my private fork to discuss the changes in parallel.

Example query shape:

No query + Agg:

{
    "size": 0,
    "aggs": {
                        "sum_status": {
                            "sum": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        }
                    }
}

Original Response:

{
    "took": 8378,
    "timed_out": false,
    "_shards": {
        "total": 1,
        "successful": 1,
        "skipped": 0,
        "failed": 0
    },
    "hits": {
        "total": {
            "value": 1009,
            "relation": "eq"
        },
        "max_score": null,
        "hits": []
    },
    "aggregations": {
        "sum_status": {
            "value": 615579.0
        }
    }
}

Star Tree Response:

{
    "took": 16394,
    "timed_out": false,
    "_shards": {
        "total": 1,
        "successful": 1,
        "skipped": 0,
        "failed": 0
    },
    "hits": {
        "total": {
            "value": 1,
            "relation": "eq"
        },
        "max_score": null,
        "hits": []
    },
    "aggregations": {
        "sum_status": {
            "value": 615579.0
        }
    }
}

Request:

{
    "query": {
        "term": {
            "status": 200
        }
    },
    "size": 0,
    "aggs": {
                        "sum_status": {
                            "sum": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        }
                    }
}

Original Response:

{
    "took": 4038,
    "timed_out": false,
    "_shards": {
        "total": 1,
        "successful": 1,
        "skipped": 0,
        "failed": 0
    },
    "hits": {
        "total": {
            "value": 42,
            "relation": "eq"
        },
        "max_score": null,
        "hits": []
    },
    "aggregations": {
        "sum_status": {
            "value": 24745.0
        }
    }
}

Star Tree Flow Response:

{
    "took": 21120,
    "timed_out": false,
    "_shards": {
        "total": 1,
        "successful": 1,
        "skipped": 0,
        "failed": 0
    },
    "hits": {
        "total": {
            "value": 1,
            "relation": "eq"
        },
        "max_score": null,
        "hits": []
    },
    "aggregations": {
        "sum_status": {
            "value": 24745.0
        }
    }
}

Multi-aggs in a single request:

{ 
    "query": {
        "term": {
            "status": 201
        }
    },
    "size": 0,
    "aggs": {
                        "sum_status": {
                            "sum": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        },
                        "max_status": {
                            "max": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        },
                        "min_status": {
                            "min": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        },
                        "avg_status": {
                            "avg": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        },
                        "count_status": {
                            "value_count": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        }

                    }
}

Star Tree Response:

{
    "took": 28,
    "timed_out": false,
    "_shards": {
        "total": 1,
        "successful": 1,
        "skipped": 0,
        "failed": 0
    },
    "hits": {
        "total": {
            "value": 3,
            "relation": "eq"
        },
        "max_score": null,
        "hits": []
    },
    "aggregations": {
        "max_status": {
            "value": 1000.0
        },
        "sum_status": {
            "value": 32154.0
        },
        "count_status": {
            "value": 53
        },
        "avg_status": {
            "value": 606.6792452830189
        },
        "min_status": {
            "value": 200.0
        }
    }
}

Unsupported Metric Operation via star-tree:

{ 
    "query": {
        "term": {
            "status": 201
        }
    },
    "size": 0,
    "aggs": {
                        "sum_status": {
                            "sum": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        },
                        "max_status": {
                            "max": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        },
                        "min_status": {
                            "min": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        },
                        "avg_status": {
                            "avg": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        },
                        "count_status": {
                            "stats": {
                                "field": "size"
                            }
                        }

                    }
}

Defaults to original code-flow (verified by hits reported):

{
    "took": 137433,
    "timed_out": false,
    "_shards": {
        "total": 1,
        "successful": 1,
        "skipped": 0,
        "failed": 0
    },
    "hits": {
        "total": {
            "value": 53,
            "relation": "eq"
        },
        "max_score": null,
        "hits": []
    },
    "aggregations": {
        "max_status": {
            "value": 1000.0
        },
        "sum_status": {
            "value": 32154.0
        },
        "count_status": {
            "count": 53,
            "min": 200.0,
            "max": 1000.0,
            "avg": 606.6792452830189,
            "sum": 32154.0
        },
        "avg_status": {
            "value": 606.6792452830189
        },
        "min_status": {
            "value": 200.0
        }
    }
}

Approach:

  1. The query shape is identified at the shard level (SearchService.java) and the query/aggregation (if can be resolved by star-tree) is parsed to a star-tree query.
  2. The star-tree query is wrapped around OriginalOrStarTreeQuery to preserve the original query - this is because the decision to decide which implementation (default/startree) to use can be taken for a segment level.
  3. If star-tree can be utilized to answer the query, the star-tree document set is then collected by the relevant aggregator/collector. In this POC, I have made changes to SumAggregator to demonstrate the flow of changes.

Related Issues

#15257

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
  • Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)
  • Public documentation issue/PR created

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 changed the title St0 Star Tree Request/Response structure Aug 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for ad54ace: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 6c6be02: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 995db38: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 885a383: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 9491aae: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for a01c6e2: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for e4a270a: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Signed-off-by: Sandesh Kumar <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 9742432: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for 9742432: SUCCESS

Copy link
Collaborator

@msfroh msfroh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thanks for working through all these revisions @sandeshkr419!

@msfroh msfroh merged commit 456ca97 into opensearch-project:main Oct 21, 2024
70 of 73 checks passed
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Navigate to the root of your repository
cd $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x 2.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
pushd ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-15289-to-2.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 456ca97f077929ba51d53dc8578b9b770e3a2417
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-15289-to-2.x
# Go back to the original working tree
popd
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-15289-to-2.x.

@bharath-techie bharath-techie added backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch and removed backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch backport-failed labels Oct 21, 2024
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Navigate to the root of your repository
cd $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x 2.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
pushd ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-15289-to-2.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 456ca97f077929ba51d53dc8578b9b770e3a2417
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-15289-to-2.x
# Go back to the original working tree
popd
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-15289-to-2.x.

sandeshkr419 added a commit to sandeshkr419/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
dbwiddis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
@sandeshkr419 sandeshkr419 deleted the st0 branch October 22, 2024 10:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch backport-failed v2.18.0 Issues and PRs related to version 2.18.0
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants