-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 366
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improved handling of inner class named $
in JavaTemplate
#3898
Open
MBoegers
wants to merge
10
commits into
openrewrite:main
Choose a base branch
from
MBoegers:3623-$-as-inner-class
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e755345
add reproducer for bug 3623
MBoegers 109e681
Fix TypeUtils.toFullyQualifiedName to handle mixins of $
MBoegers 9b48034
Use TypeUtils to determine FQN properly
MBoegers c0d6c08
remove unused imports
MBoegers b63e8c4
Update rewrite-java/src/main/java/org/openrewrite/java/tree/TypeUtils…
timtebeek 0556bc6
Merge branch 'main' into 3623-$-as-inner-class
timtebeek be525f8
Merge branch 'openrewrite:main' into 3623-$-as-inner-class
MBoegers f08f565
Apply suggestions from code review
timtebeek b822f87
Update rewrite-java/src/main/java/org/openrewrite/java/tree/TypeUtils…
timtebeek 36418d8
Merge branch 'main' into 3623-$-as-inner-class
timtebeek File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A
JavaType.FullyQualified
instance currently typically uses the binary name, which in the compiler's AST is represented bySymbol#flatName()
.I think that instead of changing and using
TypeUtils.toFullyQualifiedName()
to get the fully qualified name of a instances implementingJavaType.FullyQualified
we would be better off either changing the internal representation or deriving the name from the current representation.Changing the current internal representation is trickier (with regards to backward compatibility), but adding a utility that can return the "source name" for a
JavaType.FullyQualified
instance should be possible by combining what is returned bygetOwningClass()
and bygetFullyQualifiedName()
.I am saying this because a class could also be called
Foo$Bar
if you wanted to and that is another$
we shouldn't be replacing.