Update get-started.mdx

[codercatdev]

in the bottom how to deploy section it has deploy:worker I think this should match.

[vicb]

@dario-piotrowicz what do you think?
C3 template uses deploy.
We should pick either one, maybe :worker everywhere and we update here, c3, and the adapter repo?

[dario-piotrowicz]

@dario-piotrowicz what do you think? C3 template uses deploy. We should pick either one, maybe :worker everywhere and we update here, c3, and the adapter repo?

@vicb if you look at the c3.ts files for all the various types of projects you will see that all of them use "deploy" (without ":worker" or any other suffix/prefix) and I am a big fan of consistency, so if I had to chose I would go for that, I'm not against deploy:worker anyways if that's your preference

---

PS: Thanks for spotting the issue @codercatdev 🫶

[vicb]

What I mean is consistency can be 2 two things:

1. everything worker related ends with i.e. use preview:worker and deploy:worker to match build:worker and dev:worker
2. or use deploy and preview to be consistent with the c3 template

I updated (some of) the docs in #50 to use deploy and preview to match the template.

But now I'm wondering if we shouldn't got the 1 way (in docs + templates)

[dario-piotrowicz]

What I mean is consistency can be 2 two things:

1. everything worker related ends with i.e. use preview:worker and deploy:worker to match build:worker and dev:worker
2. or use deploy and preview to be consistent with the c3 template

I updated (some of) the docs in #50 to use deploy and preview to match the template.

But now I'm wondering if we shouldn't got the 1 way (in docs + templates)

my preference as I mentioned is to be consistent with the c3 template (2.) and remove the :worker to all the scripts that don't need it (note: the only one from which we can't remove the suffix is build:worker as we can't simply use build)

but again, I'm ok to go with 1. if that's your preference